From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41C2C4320A for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA6F60F58 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 1BA6F60F58 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GpwS93JdSz3cP1 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:48:57 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=pK+MLTaq; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=pK+MLTaq; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GpwRL5kbWz304R for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:48:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E254460F58; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1629215290; bh=5H+7vJbliQsK8rs/+6iZ2HR7NrfuQkz/HOEYxQLMkoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pK+MLTaqQaH4Vkn15pGfHDsShIQF/E8n2g8oBolYwxlF9M4WGXhND3rv0j/TUhOuD HiRo3zpGif/fRzNswPlKWa93QFr85bNRh1wNFt2EYzO0LpWZEiiG1iYNikRRNN/spO GeiaoWrNZS7RoMl81z0aN9Kx2cNsBbzlF/6gi1lY= Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:48:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Xianting Tian Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars() Message-ID: References: <20210817132300.165014-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: arnd@arndb.de, amit@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, osandov@fb.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:59PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > We tested the patch, it worked normally. Who is "we"? > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Like I said before, I need another developer from your company to review and sign-off on this patch (and the other one), before I am willing to look at it, based on the previous mistakes that have happened here. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A025DC432BE for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45EBC60ED5 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 45EBC60ED5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB80403A6; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMUk097gE1pH; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957C6402D5; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D581C0010; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DE7C000E for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D225940525 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F1cO3eCRvjJs for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85D0404EF for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E254460F58; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1629215290; bh=5H+7vJbliQsK8rs/+6iZ2HR7NrfuQkz/HOEYxQLMkoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pK+MLTaqQaH4Vkn15pGfHDsShIQF/E8n2g8oBolYwxlF9M4WGXhND3rv0j/TUhOuD HiRo3zpGif/fRzNswPlKWa93QFr85bNRh1wNFt2EYzO0LpWZEiiG1iYNikRRNN/spO GeiaoWrNZS7RoMl81z0aN9Kx2cNsBbzlF/6gi1lY= Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:48:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Xianting Tian Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars() Message-ID: References: <20210817132300.165014-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: arnd@arndb.de, amit@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, osandov@fb.com X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:59PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > We tested the patch, it worked normally. Who is "we"? > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Like I said before, I need another developer from your company to review and sign-off on this patch (and the other one), before I am willing to look at it, based on the previous mistakes that have happened here. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823C4C4338F for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C80B60FE6 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240928AbhHQPzf (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:55:35 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49038 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240281AbhHQPtC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:49:02 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E254460F58; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1629215290; bh=5H+7vJbliQsK8rs/+6iZ2HR7NrfuQkz/HOEYxQLMkoI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pK+MLTaqQaH4Vkn15pGfHDsShIQF/E8n2g8oBolYwxlF9M4WGXhND3rv0j/TUhOuD HiRo3zpGif/fRzNswPlKWa93QFr85bNRh1wNFt2EYzO0LpWZEiiG1iYNikRRNN/spO GeiaoWrNZS7RoMl81z0aN9Kx2cNsBbzlF/6gi1lY= Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:48:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Xianting Tian Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, osandov@fb.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars() Message-ID: References: <20210817132300.165014-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210817132300.165014-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:59PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > We tested the patch, it worked normally. Who is "we"? > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Like I said before, I need another developer from your company to review and sign-off on this patch (and the other one), before I am willing to look at it, based on the previous mistakes that have happened here. thanks, greg k-h