From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF41C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 04:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3B60232 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 04:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241880AbhIAE61 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 00:58:27 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk ([142.44.231.140]:45982 "EHLO zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230483AbhIAE60 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 00:58:26 -0400 Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mLIH7-00092F-SR; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 04:55:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 04:55:01 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Shijie Huang Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Wang Subject: Re: Is it possible to implement the per-node page cache for programs/libraries? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:07:41AM +0800, Shijie Huang wrote: > Hi Everyone, > >     In the NUMA, we only have one page cache for each file. For the > program/shared libraries, the > > remote-access delays longer then the  local-access. > > So, is it possible to implement the per-node page cache for > programs/libraries? What do you mean, per-node page cache? Multiple pages for the same area of file? That'd be bloody awful on coherency...