All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Pereira <kripper@imatronix.cl>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: qcow2 perfomance: read-only IO on the guest generates high write IO on the host
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:37:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSUSNCR6kZVnCBKF@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55980bc8-97ad-77a4-1bb7-a086f2712ea1@imatronix.cl>

[ Cc: qemu-block ]

Am 11.08.2021 um 13:36 hat Christopher Pereira geschrieben:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm reading a directory with 5.000.000 files (2,4 GB) inside a guest using
> "find | grep -c".
> 
> On the host I saw high write IO (40 MB/s !) during over 1 hour using
> virt-top.
> 
> I later repeated the read-only operation inside the guest and no additional
> data was written on the host. The operation took only some seconds.
> 
> I believe QEMU was creating some kind of cache or metadata map the first
> time I accessed the inodes.

No, at least in theory, QEMU shouldn't allocate anything when you're
just reading.

Are you sure that this isn't activity coming from your guest OS?

> But I wonder why the cache or metadata map wasn't available the first time
> and why QEMU had to recreate it?
> 
> The VM has "compressed base <- snap 1" and base was converted without
> prealloc.
> 
> Is it because we created the base using convert without metadata prealloc
> and so the metadata map got lost?
> 
> I will do some experiments soon using convert + metadata prealloc and
> probably find out myself, but I will happy to read your comments and gain
> some additional insights.
> If it the problem persists, I would try again without compression.

What were the results of your experiments? Is the behaviour related to
any of these options?

> Additional info:
> 
>  * Guest fs is xfs.
>  * (I believe the snapshot didn't significantly increase in size, but I
>    would need to double check)
>  * This is a production host with old QEMU emulator version 2.3.0
>    (qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1)

Discussing the most recent version is generally easier, but the expected
behaviour has always been the same, so it probably doesn't matter much
in this case.

Kevin



  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-11 11:36 qcow2 perfomance: read-only IO on the guest generates high write IO on the host Christopher Pereira
2021-08-24 15:37 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-09-09 10:23   ` Christopher Pereira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YSUSNCR6kZVnCBKF@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=kripper@imatronix.cl \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.