From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5ED5C433FE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAFC60FBF for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238193AbhIMIwO (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 04:52:14 -0400 Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.224]:52817 "EHLO new2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235987AbhIMIwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 04:52:13 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B658D580B05; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 04:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 04:50:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=oEBMjG HbxkehBrxFgJqADlnGq31HX2RE4tw3YGcGOxo=; b=f35bXpQY4Dkcqm2P7Tp3sF uumChSSx8jFh7qOKyLaxeRTr5e0PSckEp04xgcGNXxkxo4AXRXZeFmCoXwSoS8zz ps5NQYIakD6Owa0YnOvN89SO75qvV1qQEzEP233A380UH2+jdxA0iUHv/q98oslE wcvd+rn1QtAZvPk/G7NxK25CrK/ivKKTR/ybuQYEmGlMYMBEqugBi0IPuSRieYBn tQVMZ0hzLKK5x36ORsDFEbTiKI1zIhfuAC6RV4g2/QRRFPNGDkqX3UtDih5krgLm o28yvTFXn5W/iOGBryVWdSWM3Ne2aoAWqBq9Nm5uWQGCa81yQZ/NpTBMba1fygeg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudegjedgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefkughoucfu tghhihhmmhgvlhcuoehiughoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedtffekkeefudffveegueejffejhfetgfeuuefgvedtieehudeuueekhfduheel teenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiug hoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 04:50:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:50:51 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "Machnikowski, Maciej" , Florian Fainelli , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "richardcochran@gmail.com" , "abyagowi@fb.com" , "Nguyen, Anthony L" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Lunn , Michal Kubecek , Saeed Mahameed , Michael Chan Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status Message-ID: References: <20210906113925.1ce63ac7@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210906180124.33ff49ef@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210907075509.0b3cb353@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210907124730.33852895@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210908092115.191fdc28@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210908092115.191fdc28@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:21:15AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Mumble, mumble. Ido, Florian - any devices within your purview which > would support SyncE? Sorry for the delay, was AFK. I remember SyncE being mentioned a few times in the past, so it is likely that we will be requested to add SyncE support in mlxsw in the future. I will try to solicit feedback from colleagues more familiar with the subject and provide it here next week. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ido Schimmel Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:50:51 +0300 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status In-Reply-To: <20210908092115.191fdc28@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20210906113925.1ce63ac7@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210906180124.33ff49ef@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210907075509.0b3cb353@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210907124730.33852895@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20210908092115.191fdc28@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:21:15AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Mumble, mumble. Ido, Florian - any devices within your purview which > would support SyncE? Sorry for the delay, was AFK. I remember SyncE being mentioned a few times in the past, so it is likely that we will be requested to add SyncE support in mlxsw in the future. I will try to solicit feedback from colleagues more familiar with the subject and provide it here next week.