From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, Jacob Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86 <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] tools/objtool: Check for use of the ENQCMD instruction in the kernel Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:17:01 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YUwp7VkjApRQr/pb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YUu/6YPYwvaDwthy@otcwcpicx3.sc.intel.com> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:44:41PM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > Since you're making it a fatal error, before doing much of anything > > else, you might at well fail decode and keep it all in the x86/decode.c > > file, no need to spread this 'knowledge' any further. > Is the following updated patch a right one? Yes, that's what I was thinking of. > diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c > index bc821056aba9..3e0f928e28a5 100644 > --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c > +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(const struct elf *elf, const struct section *sec, > { > struct insn insn; > int x86_64, ret; > - unsigned char op1, op2, > + unsigned char op1, op2, op3, > rex = 0, rex_b = 0, rex_r = 0, rex_w = 0, rex_x = 0, > modrm = 0, modrm_mod = 0, modrm_rm = 0, modrm_reg = 0, > sib = 0, /* sib_scale = 0, */ sib_index = 0, sib_base = 0; > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(const struct elf *elf, const struct section *sec, > > op1 = insn.opcode.bytes[0]; > op2 = insn.opcode.bytes[1]; > + op3 = insn.opcode.bytes[2]; > > if (insn.rex_prefix.nbytes) { > rex = insn.rex_prefix.bytes[0]; > @@ -489,6 +490,16 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(const struct elf *elf, const struct section *sec, > /* nopl/nopw */ > *type = INSN_NOP; > > + } else if (op2 == 0x38 && op3 == 0xf8) { > + if (insn.prefixes.nbytes == 1 && > + insn.prefixes.bytes[0] == 0xf2) { > + /* ENQCMD cannot be used in the kernel. */ > + WARN("ENQCMD instruction at %s:%lx", sec->name, > + offset); > + > + return -1; > + } The only concern here is if we want it to be fatal or not. But otherwise this seems to be all that's required. > + > } else if (op2 == 0xa0 || op2 == 0xa8) { > > /* push fs/gs */
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jacob Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] tools/objtool: Check for use of the ENQCMD instruction in the kernel Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:17:01 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YUwp7VkjApRQr/pb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YUu/6YPYwvaDwthy@otcwcpicx3.sc.intel.com> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:44:41PM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > Since you're making it a fatal error, before doing much of anything > > else, you might at well fail decode and keep it all in the x86/decode.c > > file, no need to spread this 'knowledge' any further. > Is the following updated patch a right one? Yes, that's what I was thinking of. > diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c > index bc821056aba9..3e0f928e28a5 100644 > --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c > +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(const struct elf *elf, const struct section *sec, > { > struct insn insn; > int x86_64, ret; > - unsigned char op1, op2, > + unsigned char op1, op2, op3, > rex = 0, rex_b = 0, rex_r = 0, rex_w = 0, rex_x = 0, > modrm = 0, modrm_mod = 0, modrm_rm = 0, modrm_reg = 0, > sib = 0, /* sib_scale = 0, */ sib_index = 0, sib_base = 0; > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(const struct elf *elf, const struct section *sec, > > op1 = insn.opcode.bytes[0]; > op2 = insn.opcode.bytes[1]; > + op3 = insn.opcode.bytes[2]; > > if (insn.rex_prefix.nbytes) { > rex = insn.rex_prefix.bytes[0]; > @@ -489,6 +490,16 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(const struct elf *elf, const struct section *sec, > /* nopl/nopw */ > *type = INSN_NOP; > > + } else if (op2 == 0x38 && op3 == 0xf8) { > + if (insn.prefixes.nbytes == 1 && > + insn.prefixes.bytes[0] == 0xf2) { > + /* ENQCMD cannot be used in the kernel. */ > + WARN("ENQCMD instruction at %s:%lx", sec->name, > + offset); > + > + return -1; > + } The only concern here is if we want it to be fatal or not. But otherwise this seems to be all that's required. > + > } else if (op2 == 0xa0 || op2 == 0xa8) { > > /* push fs/gs */ _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 7:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 154+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-20 19:23 [PATCH 0/8] Re-enable ENQCMD and PASID MSR Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu/vt-d: Clean up unused PASID updating functions Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 7:34 ` Lu Baolu 2021-09-29 7:34 ` Lu Baolu 2021-09-30 0:40 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-30 0:40 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/process: Clear PASID state for a newly forked/cloned thread Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: Define and initialize a flag to identify valid PASID in the task Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/traps: Demand-populate PASID MSR via #GP Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-22 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:26 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-22 21:26 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-23 7:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-23 7:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:33 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-22 21:33 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-23 7:05 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-23 7:05 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:36 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-22 21:36 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-22 23:39 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-22 23:39 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-23 17:14 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-23 17:14 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-24 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-24 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-24 15:39 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-24 15:39 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-29 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-23 11:31 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-23 11:31 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-23 23:17 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-23 23:17 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-24 2:56 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-24 2:56 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-24 5:12 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-24 5:12 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-27 21:02 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-27 21:02 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-27 23:51 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-27 23:51 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-28 18:50 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-28 18:50 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-28 19:19 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-28 19:19 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-28 20:28 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-28 20:28 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-28 20:55 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-28 20:55 ` Dave Hansen 2021-09-28 23:10 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-28 23:10 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-28 23:50 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-28 23:50 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 0:08 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 0:08 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 0:26 ` Yu, Fenghua 2021-09-29 0:26 ` Yu, Fenghua 2021-09-29 1:06 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 1:06 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 1:16 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 1:16 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 2:11 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 2:11 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 1:56 ` Yu, Fenghua 2021-09-29 1:56 ` Yu, Fenghua 2021-09-29 2:15 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 2:15 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 16:58 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 16:58 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 17:07 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 17:07 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 17:48 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 17:48 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/mmu: Add mm-based PASID refcounting Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-23 5:43 ` Lu Baolu 2021-09-23 5:43 ` Lu Baolu 2021-09-30 0:44 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-30 0:44 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-23 14:36 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-23 14:36 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-23 16:40 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-23 16:40 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-23 17:48 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-23 17:48 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-24 13:18 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-24 13:18 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-24 16:12 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-24 16:12 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-24 23:03 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-24 23:03 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-24 23:11 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-24 23:11 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-29 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-29 12:28 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-29 12:28 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-29 16:51 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 16:51 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 17:07 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 17:07 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 16:59 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 16:59 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 17:15 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-29 17:15 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-29 17:41 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 17:41 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 17:46 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 17:46 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-29 18:07 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 18:07 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-29 18:31 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 18:31 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-29 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-29 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-24 16:12 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-24 16:12 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-25 23:13 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-25 23:13 ` Thomas Gleixner 2021-09-28 16:36 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-28 16:36 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-23 23:09 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-23 23:09 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-23 23:22 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-23 23:22 ` Luck, Tony 2021-09-24 5:17 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-24 5:17 ` Andy Lutomirski 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/cpufeatures: Re-enable ENQCMD Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] tools/objtool: Check for use of the ENQCMD instruction in the kernel Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-22 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-22 23:44 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-22 23:44 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-23 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2021-09-23 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-09-23 15:26 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-23 15:26 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-24 0:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf 2021-09-24 0:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf 2021-09-24 0:57 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-24 0:57 ` Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] docs: x86: Change documentation for SVA (Shared Virtual Addressing) Fenghua Yu 2021-09-20 19:23 ` Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YUwp7VkjApRQr/pb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \ --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \ --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \ --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.