From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612993FCC for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D7736103B; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:38:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1632757087; bh=01pncTuL6mO/zCZjIXlbG8UzM8/W78TrZdnq4pIw33o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WEyrA67ttikhX6GLVEUDRcYmxqD9leWM5LJz6W62G+Du840GRcEsMo+hCrNx107XE LO0OVd+DcdRgfhWDVnHRut1UEKtXlwCWi83DsF+Lz9Ww1Svn9AoZtvYQ0ro/qGm220 9Z7ttoqdls5NZWyrDMe5mUY+X6JSGPexQxm4BSvA= Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:37:41 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" Cc: Larry Finger , Phillip Potter , Pavel Skripkin , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Laight , Dan Carpenter , Michael Straube , Martin Kaiser Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/16] staging: r8188eu: shorten and simplify calls chains Message-ID: References: <20210924122705.3781-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> <1836626.W0nMHyKdkH@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1836626.W0nMHyKdkH@localhost.localdomain> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 02:37:52PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > On Friday, September 24, 2021 2:26:49 PM CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > --- Preface --- > > > > This is v10 of "shorten and simplify calls chain". The 14 (v7) + 2 (v8) > > patches have already been applied to staging-testing, so we have been > > requested to reset the numbering of the remaining patches to 01/16, while > > discarding from v9 the above-mentioned 16 patches (otherwise we would > > have submitted a series containing 32 patches, that is 1 patch less than > > v8 because it has been dropped by us in what we considered it > > unnecessary - it was about fixing a misspelled word in a comment). > > Hello all, > > Please disregard this weird cover. I don't know how I've been able to make > the mess you see in the subject. The good one has been sent soon after this. > And please, let me know if it is necessary to resend in order to have the > cover letter as the first email of the thread. Nah, I can figure it out, looks good, let's queue it up and see what breaks :) thanks, greg k-h