From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB62C433FE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E98A60F4A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240690AbhI1MX3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:23:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240571AbhI1MX0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:23:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC68CC061575; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id s21so17665693wra.7; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:21:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DbV4N5PhqJtlgtuyy0h3X70tpaeuVVIyfxNq0a/QMSQ=; b=ORwcHqKhhrxtA8IobMphvT/AJFHPxQ3pNnDqr3il3+NOnuC3ztwAZ6lxVKotK+r6Qk sBP+onJaPBGKogK2rH+gQB7CNwFYsiwA5sERxAiMXLZ8e8Egu2X6/g9IkuQVoIWzHnmM pwNt3FtqqHAgaXtg6C76HpdKL8znHi2xbgiBgfpV4RcFZZtjN4REEzHuMP7SVnAYIaHy dkGlPL/WZ1HuOj9nLJr5FQQsDMayjLlH9q7uDCW7j6+zkQyXOJB157K26Y73XVPkdQPm r5AoKVonnpfF7+Oh6Wt3M91LHdFkPpVmQ4z6M2fbWzme88GuLDyzcHRC4n/aN13hoAbs K/dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DbV4N5PhqJtlgtuyy0h3X70tpaeuVVIyfxNq0a/QMSQ=; b=AKL3fx4Z78s4Ykj/vW7wURQQuLllRTkonrmxBhnj1V7uKVEgWwXFvcOX4/qhC0mt6R Ul3dlwyamfiIEIFYfAFWKhTIPwWh9DqSltHLDhAPCSvzfeGz3ZyvtVopoi1XyH7DTq2j Z4101ZPpVIRkY0/jfAmvr2rAFzBckmkfUP0wEe0+2OLjcku3FbjYQT+2xvF27dE1lzdg Zs26MJr0r+4OkujOSxbty2HL6KhLyMDz4LDeqG8XgqiRffW2YKmOEh23c6QFJPqJSA/Z TNpcdhcGxF1+sPAfAZYtQ8FFsD+512VyzsSyw9VpirejwupbwHjViU/dNVh5Zu9CPiwp DFMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533s8HwO7VOQt0/euYP4RMx8H3ectwMn4sbJaKU/SHRZgxdMNRys gI/tUfloDGS3nCaDYdsBFrw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyu/h5gAqCKXLLsMoqRl57IUXijmIAmlj8gdckjlLxFYIMW9H0ioMaOlasRijdQlLzZMMfbgg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f601:: with SMTP id t1mr6278550wrp.9.1632831705566; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm19431082wrb.33.2021.09.28.05.21.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:21:43 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/102] 5.10.70-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20210928071741.331837387@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210928071741.331837387@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 09:18:56AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.70 release. > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:17:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/200 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/201 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip