From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Behringer UFX1604 and UFX1204 unneeded implicit feedback
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:26:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVS+AsiTRt1FqMn0@geday> (raw)
Hello Takashi and everyone,
Behringer UFX1204 and UFX1604 have sync endpoints and we set up
implicit feedback sync on them. This is against the UAC spec.
We've already fixed a major source of noise by explictly setting up
the Clock Selector. Therefore in my humble opinion we should now
disable implicit feedback sync for those two devices.
What do you think?
Thank you,
Geraldo Nascimento
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 19:26 Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2021-09-29 19:29 ` Behringer UFX1604 and UFX1204 unneeded implicit feedback Bert Schiettecatte
2021-09-29 19:38 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2021-09-30 11:47 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVS+AsiTRt1FqMn0@geday \
--to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.