All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Use software node API with additional device properties
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:05:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVWL3PyYRanGTlVG@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e3e9a3-c430-db98-9e6d-0e3526ddc6f7@linaro.org>

Hi guys,

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:33:27AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> On 2021/9/30 上午1:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Zhangfei, author of 8304a3a199ee ("PCI: Set dma-can-stall for
> > HiSilicon chips"), which added this]
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:37:28PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > Using device_create_managed_software_node() to inject the
> > > properties in quirk_huawei_pcie_sva() instead of with the
> > > old device_add_properties() API.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > This is fine with me, but please update the subject line and commit
> > log something like this:
> > 
> >    PCI: Convert to device_create_managed_software_node()
> > 
> >    In quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(), use device_create_managed_software_node()
> >    instead of device_add_properties() to set the "dma-can-stall"
> >    property.
> > 
> >    This resolves a software node lifetime issue (see 151f6ff78cdf
> >    ("software node: Provide replacement for device_add_properties()"))
> >    and paves the way for removing device_add_properties() completely.
> > 
> > Actually, 8304a3a199ee was merged during the v5.15 merge window, so if
> > this does in fact fix a lifetime issue, I can merge this before
> > v5.15-final.

It does not fix lifetime issues. This is because device_del() called
device_remove_properties() unconditionally with every device.

There should be no functional impact.

> > I know *this* quirk applies to AMBA devices, and I assume they cannot
> > be removed, so there's no actual lifetime problem in this particular
> > case, but in general it looks like a problem for PCI devices.
> Thanks Bjorn
> This patch also works, though the quirk is for platform devices and not
> removed.

If the device is really never removed, then we could also constify the
node and the properties in it. Then the patch would look like this:

diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index b6b4c803bdc94..3dc7a1c62bf24 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -1833,13 +1833,17 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0x1610, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI
  * even when a "PCI" device turns out to be a regular old SoC device
  * dressed up as a RCiEP and normal rules don't apply.
  */
+static const struct property_entry huawei_pcie_sva_props[] = {
+       PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("dma-can-stall"),
+       { }
+};
+
+static const struct software_node huawei_pcie_sva_swnode = {
+       .properties = huawei_pcie_sva_props,
+};
+
 static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
-       struct property_entry properties[] = {
-               PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("dma-can-stall"),
-               {},
-       };
-
        if (pdev->revision != 0x21 && pdev->revision != 0x30)
                return;
 
@@ -1850,7 +1854,7 @@ static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
         * can set it directly.
         */
        if (!pdev->dev.of_node &&
-           device_add_properties(&pdev->dev, properties))
+           device_add_software_node(&pdev->dev, &huawei_pcie_sva_swnode))
                pci_warn(pdev, "could not add stall property");
 }
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa250, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);


Let me know if you prefer it that way.

thanks,

-- 
heikki

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29 13:37 [PATCH 0/2] device property: Remove device_add_properties() Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Use software node API with additional device properties Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 17:08   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-30  2:33     ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-09-30 10:05       ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2021-09-30 10:19         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-30 10:37           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-30 11:26             ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] device property: Remove device_add_properties() API Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 15:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] device property: Remove device_add_properties() Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVWL3PyYRanGTlVG@kuha.fi.intel.com \
    --to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.