From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D87C433F5 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF9261130 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231187AbhJDIOw (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 04:14:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:23923 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230510AbhJDIOv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 04:14:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633335182; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Jhd7OCRxNEDwqPIqJkCKn7zgxcgAxTP1VUtMdDFCHtI=; b=NOxQ+ig+doI1mv0cgqR5oXW7kpKjaQb3YxYrv0fpUoXubxyGLvROYnHc0+kpLhWcpBuQPi UX2+W30oNhhcNmsCnUK4gmSuAlZJs7UDLNdbzZpK9Hw4mVd8vl3VjYqGhs2V/7zwiPwxlX Dr1I/s7gCnEUXlxq50fw3t9G7WmBjt4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-594-J9LpLyzIM4mE7HeEaCjZMg-1; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 04:13:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: J9LpLyzIM4mE7HeEaCjZMg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45991100CCD5; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.194.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7F75DEFB; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 09:12:57 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Max Gurtovoy Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, oren@nvidia.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kw@linux.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI/sysfs: use NUMA_NO_NODE macro Message-ID: References: <20211003091344.718-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> <20211003091344.718-2-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="amH8vhhIjD2i2fX9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211003091344.718-2-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --amH8vhhIjD2i2fX9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 12:13:44PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > Use the proper macro instead of hard-coded (-1) value. >=20 > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Wilczy=C5=84ski > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy > --- > drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --amH8vhhIjD2i2fX9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmFat4cACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8hJ4wf9GcRK8XZiWv922sRtrFwXiKXZZUdZlX0c9sOkNLALtbAjvM7g1GfcAjfm 0uAAo6FYpUoDp64ToDc8V3O5nFsWrA2142I4WmiRx/4bbPMTSLvgwLoDRGUd6sAY BacsHNGjDDALdg0OkVAI+epGNiT36D4J40c7Qrc0UD5FMZm/RI+pntvixd2alugL AYKH9k+0T6tKAX9vMXul7bwuSfn3vclTzOjds6RFh05gjo+1KT8lRIVShhUKbTq6 Yo69Ft+OK2sRbXZBJ1tFcjjcMeI/rA6PdcOdbq31VYM5KqW3agADNvAfKrVb++fL /tJNG1/MJzvdhw2DnReH13VL0pSp6Q== =FKzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --amH8vhhIjD2i2fX9--