From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE322C433EF for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 07:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A587A60F6D for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 07:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229759AbhJIHka (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 03:40:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52818 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229560AbhJIHkZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 03:40:25 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 479E4C061570 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 00:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f1e220071dfbf03a8036444.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f1e:2200:71df:bf03:a803:6444]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 4E75B1EC047E; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 09:38:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1633765107; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=qmwSpK5n/52Nbx+LHauAcoGj7Nk39lsvcR0objnyrNY=; b=gf/P9uesWOOY52BMtXXVxYxj2LjYfKTp4FgrN/O0abe63FGEz3SxULuQKtBaoXDynVV5Vr gVmUKc8WZ0+gb+1o0VGLfx3jI7uIm10uzjTmV0kN/0hUrzTn5/0c7iVCxKf3Ex9C8lmKQM OjfFSkGCSWOnlp/o2nmfFilnOMBdCe8= Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 09:38:23 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , David Hildenbrand , Andrea Arcangeli , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Deep Shah , VMware Inc , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Peter H Anvin , Dave Hansen , Tony Luck , Dan Williams , Andi Kleen , Kirill Shutemov , Sean Christopherson , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/11] Add TDX Guest Support (Initial support) Message-ID: References: <20211009053747.1694419-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211009053747.1694419-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 10:37:36PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: > Hi All, Now let's see: you sent this particular patchset on Monday, 4th. The usual process is that you wait at least a week for review comments, incorporate them into your next revision and then you send it. We were still reviewing v8... But I see already a v9 in my mbox from yesterday and *also* a v10. v9 you probably didn't build-test enough so you had to hastily do a v10. 4 days later! And because that's not enough, there are a bunch of other TDX patchsets from you flying in constantly. Now, please explain to me how you imagine this whole review thing is supposed to work? You hammer people with patchsets until they go in? Forget proper review? Or people should drop the other things they have to do for their jobs and deal only with your patchsets? How about we trade places: you review and try to get sh*t to work and I hammer you with patchsets every 3-4 days? For chrissakes, please calm down with that constant hammering and try to put yourself in the maintainer's shoes for once. Also, try to realize that hammering people with patchsets will get you the *opposite* of what you're trying to achieve - you will get ignored. Geez. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette