From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99A8C433FE for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53FF60F4A for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239379AbhJMKcx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 06:32:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50502 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239036AbhJMKcw (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 06:32:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50534C061570; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id v17so6611306wrv.9; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:30:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zGInbL+PJQYpMOr1raJ7pJXi1nSy8DXAxDMHDzmS0O0=; b=DKFNzwr1Lo5R4tVSGHvmocdC2aoh8sgC9FiaMRgKEVcZfYoqAtcb/gGRZemltj/AhW w9K/wBsx3d1ex447aHR57z8USrwU8xJk/7ymQ1OF8YM7MiwgfSXqkIel9Jd6oujiWe9z C7kS19BYfweD4npCMLm+N7ydadMlFu/ugYCrFr6zEBndhxKNF48yMjNmNQw7HgQHET+i LVIq6TiGaI6gQr7iMiZRoNKk4K6oJ0+5yXsjaMq1fkzBdDbaN5UQqcQ+3q6EKDnJF7hA gRF0Nb7gAHKcea0aX14zDY/h7RnJ819lgNAuxXNPwnE5R6gru+BNPktJf8ZA4FZAsFLL AmbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zGInbL+PJQYpMOr1raJ7pJXi1nSy8DXAxDMHDzmS0O0=; b=sDxF0pqrxdip8JGRu6Fs0qZ8UShcvqbjg6inJxC+PRqhZ0TKxDoMrwwu3xLLBaufHe DHADNGVki0f12tXt+luFi8EhvJRPQT1uaIccTH/hf6EuOc/E7fwLacIYQlPa1Ou0pbXS dFGhnlNCJFHgdSFv0oTzSbT8G8/jA9o/5nNZjIt7sXUsgIVU+6CXSPsH5piNjZLxluS4 qDLDjCycu+m6M34q87f4aTEqoILn88M5OM52j21ZXMyJEMTQfXLZ0edCfOBxO/FvXwRf 5fLUJNkSrxNF9Kg11TozVTDIBm9WjRvefgtqw+pGkPFd50VkX0mixSyylfn/LyNExGs9 MopQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ry925H3lZRFmc9kbnSofyILEMdnxdw0tWprjm0vxTZxyY9oem uwkYwGzFIT1c01jX0h/1tXM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw78G3tKjNnagGB2A04xXOmjJyJpJiq7bSBjovXQCwYfDfDJ7ykZSywcE3JmjM0XDrZbavkJA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d51:: with SMTP id k17mr28923969wri.233.1634121047691; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm13545527wrg.57.2021.10.13.03.30.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:30:45 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/27] 4.19.211-rc3 review Message-ID: References: <20211012093340.313468813@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211012093340.313468813@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:36:57AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.211 release. > There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:33:32 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/252 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip