On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:12:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > If '#interrupt-cells' doesn't pass checks, no reason to run interrupt > provider check. > > Cc: Andre Przywara > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Applied, thanks. > --- > checks.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c > index fb3fc9cda4b1..8153793a3e7d 100644 > --- a/checks.c > +++ b/checks.c > @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ static void check_interrupt_provider(struct check *c, > FAIL(c, dti, node, > "Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider"); > } > -WARNING(interrupt_provider, check_interrupt_provider, NULL); > +WARNING(interrupt_provider, check_interrupt_provider, NULL, &interrupts_extended_is_cell); > > static void check_interrupts_property(struct check *c, > struct dt_info *dti, -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson