From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2941AC433F5 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D43160BD3 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236361AbhJOH4y (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 03:56:54 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57288 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230049AbhJOH4y (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 03:56:54 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FAD16115C; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:54:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1634284488; bh=KqWk1XspLUF0AkW/WhCFKLrHbQkPk/fBP/58gbnZajE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TA+X3vECaP2GJq2y3Ebh+CP3NEOyy7eoxbsk6aXZCAfr2c5eW9EKCvWEA0ljSlgJY BfN8B+eyzbJCb1PLl3WMe/u5RqYYwAWxxNarFU9rPIb/KZwQpuXmuuiSKlnuRDTluq hVTSa3SF15T6n07XH4Y/Fmo/Ul8MKYeAr58QhWFs= Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:54:45 +0200 From: Greg KH To: braewoods@braewoods.net Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-storage: Add compatibility quirk flags for iODD 2531/2541 Message-ID: References: <20211014015504.2695089-1-braewoods+lkml@braewoods.net> <20211014022049.GB910341@rowland.harvard.edu> <8466fa531529630936ee0f0e290b54b2@braewoods.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8466fa531529630936ee0f0e290b54b2@braewoods.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 01:29:20AM -0500, braewoods@braewoods.net wrote: > On 2021-10-13 21:20, Alan Stern wrote: > > In the future, you should always include a version number in the email > > Subject: line (for example, "[PATCH v2]") so that readers will know > > which patch is which. And you should include, here just below the "---" > > line, a description of how this version differs from the previous > > version. See the email archives for examples of multi-version patches. > > > > Nevertheless, this looks okay. > > > > Acked-by: Alan Stern > > Noted. I'll do that for future patches. On a side note, any idea how long it > normally takes to get a simple patch like this committed? I've had mixed > experiences with getting feedback on patches. Sometimes my patches just get > totally ignored. Depends on the subsystem and the patch submitted. Also always use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to properly copy the needed maintainers and mailing lists. Sometimes patches get lost in the noise if the right people are not copied. thanks, greg k-h