From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4058BC433F5 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DDA61051 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232153AbhKAMZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 08:25:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55798 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232029AbhKAMZi (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 08:25:38 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3554C061714; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 05:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0cfa00ec4efdd1c18768d4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:fa00:ec4e:fdd1:c187:68d4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2464F1EC0372; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:23:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1635769383; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=aOWJ/xWRA0KQY6ubEa2Bhf55JdIZ4Fz4oQrfWNl+tj4=; b=dcatoeFJAnA20lMUZJRKvn0cbBBsIc3RoG3IC3+Xf0OHOQuZ0xiJqcAMv/wgzNXvu4b9DA K19aVqVWqNSU3qieYv5/SEzpB2oq6eaZrg8JWNQ92f9Z/pFUL9cb1UjUvrOW/BkqXEmi4c KDhjMwUs1dmiyXsqRDD1tNM+8gVu9K0= Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:22:58 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Xuesong Chen Cc: Will Deacon , helgaas@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering Message-ID: References: <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com> <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:12:15PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote: > I'm very sorry about the non-constructived response, and I'd like to > take this chance to withdraw them entirely... personally this is not a > good example in terms of the mood or the way of expression. Good idea. There are other maintainers who would ignore you indefinitely for uncalled for explosions like that. And then you would have achieved the opposite of what you were aiming for, with that rant. To Will's point, you can always read Documentation/process/ while waiting for your patches to get reviewed - there the whole process is explained and what the best ways and times are to send a patchset. HTH. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E183C433EF for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0015760F36 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:25:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 0015760F36 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1yqWew6P0hQazlpdrJs5CmffNaAosU8MyQM00vF3Ycc=; b=BeMTlfhUpg0wVQ VGQR+I/+FfNXYIJ/nCa44CAxv33QXwQvK4KDvBSIq7jjdgceal36v4cv1iulM/wRBiOvxUeb56zmX gQCYVPdijPi/jpnHU03ppJNB6RBX48NH2tv540yTeU/UXQpjuWGTEqDgjjxzwOVRyJlik8Tpi0tVX ICPd61belSDAhTj969eTqNernZdIFDazzgJWCWHgRVKPm3qpu2nN1+cKWBI/omLw80PQKh0XS0w7o QRog6cGOBPCVb0O8FLbim0mAFv2DUiiUdDDu0x3mNDEGCfJIPMM7DVQvoGIT+m8zzYOXedITsRIZM M7hatHjKwQpE3ig5gtWA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhWLL-00GO1q-DC; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:23:15 +0000 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhWLF-00GNya-Fz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:23:12 +0000 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0cfa00ec4efdd1c18768d4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:fa00:ec4e:fdd1:c187:68d4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2464F1EC0372; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:23:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1635769383; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=aOWJ/xWRA0KQY6ubEa2Bhf55JdIZ4Fz4oQrfWNl+tj4=; b=dcatoeFJAnA20lMUZJRKvn0cbBBsIc3RoG3IC3+Xf0OHOQuZ0xiJqcAMv/wgzNXvu4b9DA K19aVqVWqNSU3qieYv5/SEzpB2oq6eaZrg8JWNQ92f9Z/pFUL9cb1UjUvrOW/BkqXEmi4c KDhjMwUs1dmiyXsqRDD1tNM+8gVu9K0= Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:22:58 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Xuesong Chen Cc: Will Deacon , helgaas@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering Message-ID: References: <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com> <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211101_052309_729803_B97118D5 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.73 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:12:15PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote: > I'm very sorry about the non-constructived response, and I'd like to > take this chance to withdraw them entirely... personally this is not a > good example in terms of the mood or the way of expression. Good idea. There are other maintainers who would ignore you indefinitely for uncalled for explosions like that. And then you would have achieved the opposite of what you were aiming for, with that rant. To Will's point, you can always read Documentation/process/ while waiting for your patches to get reviewed - there the whole process is explained and what the best ways and times are to send a patchset. HTH. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel