From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627B4C433EF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF7B60C51 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236685AbhJZRtU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 13:49:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236701AbhJZRtT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 13:49:19 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE09C061745 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=uyk4EEnZfAucuLAziXWqQNuTImmXkBpvJyFXF1BlOFE=; b=QrclmoA+T+6a+I5vVlyWzHxUS9 Raqg2ZMET3qonKvpa/ISG+DmfeHMUKZMsuu4lSSb8yV+qPXwS8jtFE2Yku25tHMVRcbA0Hz9XkdrI jXljFfmYS+b0CZlLd3GpMFROR6S64bfFFmE8/4J4kQk+lMP57t7ISCzdSanz7L4vO7ltSr54dFFvH jnGar1aFcDUhnrMEOBTYXtp5wh6vvFU+jb8apZNxlXj9AqE8Es6cMKR+db+ZK5wAqk5FCCkFb0e0f 6jT41INovOzYwM8fOtP4LIoX3KmmVdfw8QxeEP34yJod2R9rloTxfkObqb0wBTPN2y2VyM4xqRam5 htJcOtZA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:55322) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfQXF-0005cx-Fr; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:46:53 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mfQXE-0006wd-OZ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:46:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:46:52 +0100 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Sean Anderson Cc: Nicolas Ferre , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Claudiu Beznea , Antoine Tenart Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: macb: Fix several edge cases in validate Message-ID: References: <20211025172405.211164-1-sean.anderson@seco.com> <5e946ab6-94fe-e760-c64b-5abaf8ac9068@seco.com> <61d9f92e-78d8-5d14-50d1-1ed886ec0e17@seco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61d9f92e-78d8-5d14-50d1-1ed886ec0e17@seco.com> Sender: Russell King (Oracle) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 01:28:15PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: > Actually, according to the Zynq UltraScale+ Devices Register Reference > [1], the PCS does not support 10/100. So should SGMII even fall through > here? > > [1] https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/gem___pcs_control.html Hmm. That brings with it fundamental question: if the PCS supports 1G only, does it _actually_ support Cisco SGMII, or does it only support 1000base-X? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!