All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Alejandro Sanchez <asanchez1987@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] prompt.c: add and use a GIT_TEST_TERMINAL_PROMPT=true
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 07:57:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYJ5IpvGRoDvp8V6@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch-2.2-964e7f4531f-20211102T155046Z-avarab@gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

> In 97387c8bdd9 (am: read interactive input from stdin, 2019-05-20) we
> we fixed a behavior change in the conversion of git-am from a
> shellscript to a C program by changing it from using git_prompt() to
> using fgets(..., stdin). This ensured that we could run:
> 
>     echo y | git am --interactive [...]
> 
> But along with that in the subsequent 6e7baf246a2 (am: drop tty
> requirement for --interactive, 2019-05-20) we had to remove support
> for:
> 
>     git am --interactive </dev/null
> 
> This change builds on the refactoring of git_prompt() into "normal
> prompt" and "wants password" functions in the preceding commit, and
> moves "git am --interactive" back to using the prompt function.

Why do we want to do that? The only reason I mentioned that "/dev/null"
thing in the earlier commit is that it's pointless.

IMHO nothing should be using git_prompt() outside of the credential
code. They should just be reading from stdin, which is much more
flexible. If a caller knows that stdin is coming from elsewhere, they
can redirect from /dev/tty.

> It seems to me that using /dev/tty is desirable over using stdin,
> these prompts are meant to be interactive, and our acceptance of stdin
> was an artifact of how these commands were originally implemented in
> shellscript.

Basically, I think I just disagree with this paragraph entirely. Moving
to stdin in the commits you referenced was done to help testing, but I
also think it's just a more flexible direction overall.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-03 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20  8:35 Abort (core dumped) Alejandro Sanchez
2019-05-20 10:02 ` Jeff King
2019-05-20 12:06   ` [PATCH 0/4] fix BUG() with "git am -i --resolved" Jeff King
2019-05-20 12:07     ` [PATCH 1/4] am: simplify prompt response handling Jeff King
2019-05-20 12:09     ` [PATCH 2/4] am: read interactive input from stdin Jeff King
2019-05-20 12:11     ` [PATCH 3/4] am: drop tty requirement for --interactive Jeff King
2019-05-20 12:50       ` Jeff King
2019-05-23  6:44         ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-05-24  6:27           ` Jeff King
2021-11-02 16:48             ` [PATCH 0/2] prompt.c: split up git_prompt(), read from /dev/tty, not STDIN Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-02 16:48               ` [PATCH 1/2] prompt.c: split up the password and non-password handling Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-03 11:53                 ` Jeff King
2021-11-03 17:28                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-02 16:48               ` [PATCH 2/2] prompt.c: add and use a GIT_TEST_TERMINAL_PROMPT=true Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-03 11:57                 ` Jeff King [this message]
2021-11-03 15:12                   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-04  9:58                     ` Jeff King
2021-11-03 17:42                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-04  8:48                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-11-04  9:47                       ` Jeff King
2021-11-04  9:53                     ` Jeff King
2019-05-20 12:13     ` [PATCH 4/4] am: fix --interactive HEAD tree resolution Jeff King
2019-05-23  7:12       ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-05-24  6:39         ` Jeff King
2019-05-24  6:46           ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2019-05-28 11:06           ` [PATCH " Johannes Schindelin
2019-05-28 21:35             ` Jeff King
2019-05-29 11:56               ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-26 14:20                 ` Alejandro Sanchez
2019-09-26 21:11                   ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYJ5IpvGRoDvp8V6@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=asanchez1987@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.