From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FD4C433EF
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78FE6152A
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:45:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S233252AbhKKBrv (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:47:51 -0500
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55164 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S233150AbhKKBrt (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:47:49 -0500
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0647C061766
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:45:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id gt5so3001954pjb.1
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:45:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20210112;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to;
        bh=vIpqkuXH/BEP47oEfxhMZ9/fTD6xVKLD28FU3QaYHLg=;
        b=mM69LO5YQ6sqQc8Le0frsg9F3hqNgWpT2kCUVE55Ec6XVmIu9DQfmszelkI97gfwre
         014Qezf+KDo6iflV5bNvhE7KfBAhkKVXODMe6VNdoJINHgisiEgTQMquKsqFV1fm185d
         MwUEn8MkPQjzJdo2iB1Bd93EX6f+U4I79VFK6n7okZD9nkY6Mq3xdiK05S14/iKUzlnk
         VWCy0+U54EA1ov52EvgFXy3IzMYePujUrjR7lUA/p944Zx2YMyq7wxpoUei96DYgq8y8
         vtVwALtuZUMMRDqXM47ZoctqCW52q7b6ty/7uCZ/gEaK4AqntWFTy58VUdVPUldxW6S0
         jFqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
        bh=vIpqkuXH/BEP47oEfxhMZ9/fTD6xVKLD28FU3QaYHLg=;
        b=wXVlLDuiHd/FnsuwOjSFzCgkjZJB4i34r3tTXitq6HH3Ylq9I0tMHeLp/azXNAveil
         b5Ogd2Tp6MocenZcMUDO54FbtndFDgVJPmPoaXstfunKH7xbHx2RVkXMq1WVrqW1dxtI
         3sEuZlxvdzsgurfTXRqUZp+4bLUsb3pgb7EhgS6l7Ac4zRedepJJw11AU5BwSBe2/Ao5
         ZBEtzFRqqfep0282GS8NWs/AE8xVeCv+u0bXoNwBSwJHkgcSnIUagNvEBfqHUps9Lkma
         W5sEMyUTzV6W4VY9cbZBLAjqGCL2Rj21oL8+37uEwMCoQZUjWQGxk6JmO9X3TZo0LoYQ
         XHzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533d4ZVarq3Siz4W1Iy4i7UisiofyZNDIv7qRq0wnpszBunXCQns
        MA2YbqsjXljhWSn0fLQiiS6u3A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw65Cs7XdtqOeDTy0swpntsrIFQd+3JADjeMBvvt4fWbOcVc3oGGNi04LpHcIEZAJqhVlKzlg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:350c:: with SMTP id ls12mr4066067pjb.197.1636595100452;
        Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:45:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm860341pfv.176.2021.11.10.17.44.59
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:44:59 -0800 (PST)
Date:   Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:44:56 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
        Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of
 make_spte
Message-ID: <YYx1mDJo/L79cKOH@google.com>
References: <20211110223010.1392399-1-bgardon@google.com>
 <20211110223010.1392399-12-bgardon@google.com>
 <80407e4a-36e1-e606-ed9f-74429f850e77@redhat.com>
 <CANgfPd8hzDU+v52t9Kr=b48utC1p_j3yJ8gHzo-uifAxHbh-eQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YYxvSfUPTXbclpSa@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YYxvSfUPTXbclpSa@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> These are all related to guest context:
> 	int (*page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault);
> 	void (*inject_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> 				  struct x86_exception *fault);

That's incorrect, page_fault() and inject_page_fault() could be per-VM.  Neither
is particularly interesting though.