From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Gu Shengxian <gushengxian@yulong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: soc-dai: update snd_soc_dai_delay() to snd_soc_pcm_dai_delay()
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:39:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ+8WbwDA9oQoRSk@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cc78158-e288-e949-594f-0ab939a35942@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 393 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:43:30PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> When the hw_ptr is updated, the avail/delay value are also modified.
> see the diagram in
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/sound/designs/timestamping.html?highlight=pcm%20timestamping
> I would think it's more accurate to update the delay information while
> dealing with the hw_ptr update, no?
Morimoto-san?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 7:44 [PATCH 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: tidyup soc_pcm_pointer()'s delay update method Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: soc-dai: update snd_soc_dai_delay() to snd_soc_pcm_dai_delay() Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-16 20:43 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-11-25 16:39 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-11-25 23:41 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-26 14:09 ` Mark Brown
2021-11-29 15:42 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] ASoC: soc-component: add snd_soc_pcm_component_delay() Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: amd: acp-pcm-dma: add .delay support Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: intel: sst-mfld-platform-pcm: " Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: tidyup soc_pcm_pointer()'s delay update method Kuninori Morimoto
2021-11-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-11-29 16:45 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZ+8WbwDA9oQoRSk@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=gushengxian@yulong.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.