From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
jie.deng@intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@axis.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:24:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ8rxHDPo68AT4HN@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125032119.vklsh4yymwnalh5b@vireshk-i7>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 242 bytes --]
> Wolfram, you can apply that one as well, it looks okay.
Is it? I read that the code only waits for the last request while
Michael suggested to wait for all of them? And he did not ack patch 2
while he acked patch 1. Did I misunderstand?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 16:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-11 16:04 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-11 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-11 16:04 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-11 16:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-11 16:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-12 2:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-12 2:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-19 15:30 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-19 15:30 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-23 9:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-23 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-23 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-23 9:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-11 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: virtio: fix completion handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-11 16:04 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-11 16:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-11 16:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-02 15:34 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-12-02 15:34 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2021-11-24 23:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-24 23:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-25 3:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-25 3:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-25 6:24 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2021-11-25 6:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-11-25 6:47 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZ8rxHDPo68AT4HN@kunai \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=conghui.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jie.deng@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.