From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7E1C433EF for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:17:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A5961A38 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:17:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 69A5961A38 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50482 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmwSp-0000gO-Cf for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:17:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmwPJ-0004Rd-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:13:47 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:52986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmwPG-00065k-QL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:13:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637061222; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F6tvwZSfjT/wcE20ndg4MqLxYJK9FrbzcLuSlFpR77Y=; b=N/m/AtZzP9NIPCh+9p5IWrwzjPA8g5nIooKMMvirya2U2ZnkCJrDwOnuINFHDZGCeQh3Wn TR0q0RFG8XHKfBPhrs0YE1AqFbmwm0zEXdhn/OCZSVFWvgjkIsl8YKT/rXYSywDuenqOiS xb8nJ/nYgJ3KOZZs4U0roi6MEeebdQM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-63-BXIJUm5xNdyBvreyrRiH0Q-1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:13:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: BXIJUm5xNdyBvreyrRiH0Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBF980A5C3; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.195.12]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADF35D6BA; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:13:17 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Christian Schoenebeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k Message-ID: References: <2186445.RDNOEBgitd@silver> <2888852.ZcFpDoVWxJ@silver> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2888852.ZcFpDoVWxJ@silver> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=stefanha@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=stefanha@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.697, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Laurent Vivier , qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Amit Shah , David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz , virtio-fs@redhat.com, Eric Auger , Hanna Reitz , "Gonglei \(Arei\)" , Gerd Hoffmann , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , Paolo Bonzini , Fam Zheng , Raphael Norwitz , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 03:32:46PM +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > I would appreciate if you'd let me know whether I should suggest the disc= ussed=20 > two virtio capabilities as official virtio ones, or whether I should dire= ctly=20 > go for 9p device specific ones instead. Please propose changes for increasing the maximum descriptor chain length in the common virtqueue section of the spec. Stefan --nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmGTkk0ACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8g8dwf+NKjImrISNDFd0MQBdcOG6HbhAqP0j+Hs0u+aeU0LOf8nAvW1ZapOaenF xFlKRSsVnQh8OfXiCyQpnnXm+L9vaCiMVE/BJ2aqBtvgqsnWh7LJIzTXvCl7E+37 daJ+NnYnSL19Z7CYIgp5Jj5SLDNMuc5YeV9MizvkQjrqugRQUtgwNNH4JpKksW4V a1q+u66jcX3J+t+VEeluJ2DpqEX7EYg7oJoOuVq2rsGZ4qCHNwUc8J+fOH6tcWKT fOHWj4EV4MPXuutJ62aH5wM0ppnIePOBaYfnBeebL359/5G/ZAOqw7rAfsqIp3Q0 tSpSm29hftrbWKH7bDTIFHX4BQMDcw== =JRXa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:13:17 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: References: <2186445.RDNOEBgitd@silver> <2888852.ZcFpDoVWxJ@silver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2888852.ZcFpDoVWxJ@silver> Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: increase VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to 32k List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Schoenebeck Cc: Kevin Wolf , Laurent Vivier , qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Amit Shah , David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com, Eric Auger , Hanna Reitz , "Gonglei (Arei)" , Gerd Hoffmann , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , Paolo Bonzini , Fam Zheng , Raphael Norwitz --nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 03:32:46PM +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > I would appreciate if you'd let me know whether I should suggest the disc= ussed=20 > two virtio capabilities as official virtio ones, or whether I should dire= ctly=20 > go for 9p device specific ones instead. Please propose changes for increasing the maximum descriptor chain length in the common virtqueue section of the spec. Stefan --nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmGTkk0ACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8g8dwf+NKjImrISNDFd0MQBdcOG6HbhAqP0j+Hs0u+aeU0LOf8nAvW1ZapOaenF xFlKRSsVnQh8OfXiCyQpnnXm+L9vaCiMVE/BJ2aqBtvgqsnWh7LJIzTXvCl7E+37 daJ+NnYnSL19Z7CYIgp5Jj5SLDNMuc5YeV9MizvkQjrqugRQUtgwNNH4JpKksW4V a1q+u66jcX3J+t+VEeluJ2DpqEX7EYg7oJoOuVq2rsGZ4qCHNwUc8J+fOH6tcWKT fOHWj4EV4MPXuutJ62aH5wM0ppnIePOBaYfnBeebL359/5G/ZAOqw7rAfsqIp3Q0 tSpSm29hftrbWKH7bDTIFHX4BQMDcw== =JRXa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nTmdJO8CHBrmpor9--