All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@fujitsu.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] libperf: Move perf_counts_values__scale to tools/lib/perf
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:57:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZUYWAiI6HIWPhYj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZE3Ia3UpHPx2/gh@krava>

Em Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 05:19:45PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:58:29PM +0900, Shunsuke Nakamura wrote:
> > Move perf_counts_values__scale from tools/perf/util to tools/lib/perf
> > so that it can be used with libperf.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/perf/evsel.c              | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h |  4 ++++
> >  tools/lib/perf/libperf.map          |  1 +
> >  tools/perf/util/evsel.c             | 19 -------------------
> >  tools/perf/util/evsel.h             |  3 ---
> >  5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > index 8441e3e1aaac..5097aadea37a 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > @@ -431,3 +431,22 @@ void perf_evsel__free_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> >  	zfree(&evsel->id);
> >  	evsel->ids = 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > +			       bool scale, s8 *pscaled)
> > +{
> > +	s8 scaled = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (scale) {
> > +		if (count->run == 0) {
> > +			scaled = -1;
> > +			count->val = 0;
> > +		} else if (count->run < count->ena) {
> > +			scaled = 1;
> > +			count->val = (u64)((double)count->val * count->ena / count->run);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (pscaled)
> > +		*pscaled = scaled;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > index 60eae25076d3..9013d73af22d 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> >  
> >  #include <stdint.h>
> >  #include <perf/core.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> >  
> >  struct perf_evsel;
> >  struct perf_event_attr;
> > @@ -39,5 +41,7 @@ LIBPERF_API int perf_evsel__disable_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu);
> >  LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_evsel__cpus(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> >  LIBPERF_API struct perf_thread_map *perf_evsel__threads(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> >  LIBPERF_API struct perf_event_attr *perf_evsel__attr(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > +LIBPERF_API void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > +					   bool scale, s8 *pscaled);
> 
> not sure if we should use __s8 for pscaled now when it's exported?
> it's just we use it everywhere else with '__' prefix, I forgot what's
> the difference actually ;-)

I'm moving this to be __s8, following what is being used in
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h.
 
> but other that all looks good, for the patchset:
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 
> 
> >  
> >  #endif /* __LIBPERF_EVSEL_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map b/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map
> > index 71468606e8a7..5979bf92d98f 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map
> > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ LIBPERF_0.0.1 {
> >  		perf_mmap__read_init;
> >  		perf_mmap__read_done;
> >  		perf_mmap__read_event;
> > +		perf_counts_values__scale;
> >  	local:
> >  		*;
> >  };
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > index dbfeceb2546c..49e4d0bdd7cc 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -1457,25 +1457,6 @@ void evsel__compute_deltas(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> >  	count->run = count->run - tmp.run;
> >  }
> >  
> > -void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > -			       bool scale, s8 *pscaled)
> > -{
> > -	s8 scaled = 0;
> > -
> > -	if (scale) {
> > -		if (count->run == 0) {
> > -			scaled = -1;
> > -			count->val = 0;
> > -		} else if (count->run < count->ena) {
> > -			scaled = 1;
> > -			count->val = (u64)((double) count->val * count->ena / count->run);
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (pscaled)
> > -		*pscaled = scaled;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int evsel__read_one(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread)
> >  {
> >  	struct perf_counts_values *count = perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, thread);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > index 1f7edfa8568a..8a6a4182c5fd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > @@ -190,9 +190,6 @@ static inline int evsel__nr_cpus(struct evsel *evsel)
> >  	return evsel__cpus(evsel)->nr;
> >  }
> >  
> > -void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > -			       bool scale, s8 *pscaled);
> > -
> >  void evsel__compute_deltas(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> >  			   struct perf_counts_values *count);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.27.0
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-17 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09  8:58 [PATCH v3 0/3] libperf: Unify scaling of counters obtained from perf_evsel__read() Shunsuke Nakamura
2021-11-09  8:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] libperf: Move perf_counts_values__scale to tools/lib/perf Shunsuke Nakamura
2021-11-14 16:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-17 14:57     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-11-29  7:59       ` nakamura.shun
2021-11-09  8:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] libperf: Remove scaling process from perf_mmap__read_self() Shunsuke Nakamura
2021-11-09  8:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] libperf tests: Add test_stat_multiplexing test Shunsuke Nakamura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZUYWAiI6HIWPhYj@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nakamura.shun@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.