On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:29:24AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> this is the successor of my earlier patch "pwm: Ensure for legacy
> drivers that pwm->state stays consistent" that was applied shortly to
> next until Geert found a problem with it.
> 
> I split the patch in three parts now: First the legacy handling is just
> moved to a separate function without any semantic change. Then a glitch
> is fixed, but without the regression I introduced initially. In the
> third and last patch the longstanding FIXME about breaking pwm->state if
> a callback fails is addressed.
> 
> Uwe Kleine-König (3):
>   pwm: Move legacy driver handling into a dedicated function
>   pwm: Prevent a glitch for legacy drivers
>   pwm: Restore initial state if a legacy callback fails
> 
>  drivers/pwm/core.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

I've applied this to for-next, let's see if this blows up or not.

Thierry