All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>,
	"Qi Zheng" <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Justin Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@denx.de>,
	"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wang Yugui" <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>,
	"François Guerraz" <kubrick@fgv6.net>,
	"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:12:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZYLC9D6zpUneYtn@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202111171609.56F12BD@keescook>

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 04:16:51PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Sorry for top-posting and quoting this all, but the actual people
> > involved with the wchan changes don't seem to be on the participant
> > list.
> 
> Adding more folks from a private report and
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215031
> 
> and for the new people, here's a lore link for this thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YZV02RCRVHIa144u@fedora64.linuxtx.org/
> 
> 
> FWIW, earlier bisection pointed to the stable backport of
> 5d1ceb3969b6b2e47e2df6d17790a7c5a20fcbb4 being the primary culprit.
> At first glance it seems to me that the problem with -stable is that an
> unvetted subset of the wchan refactoring series landed in -stable.

What would be the vetted subset?  :)

Anyway, I have now dropped the following patches that were in the
5.15.3-rc tree:
	bc9bbb81730e ("x86: Fix get_wchan() to support the ORC unwinder")
	42a20f86dc19 ("sched: Add wrapper for get_wchan() to keep task blocked")
	5d1ceb3969b6 ("x86: Fix __get_wchan() for !STACKTRACE")

And will push out another -rc release to let people test.

If there are any other commits I should have also dropped, please let me
know.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-18  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 10:19 [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-17 13:37 ` Fox Chen
2021-11-17 14:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-17 14:43   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-17 14:54     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-17 17:34 ` Jon Hunter
2021-11-17 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-17 20:25 ` Holger Kiehl
2021-11-18  8:14   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-18 14:08     ` Holger Kiehl
2021-11-18 17:08       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-17 20:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-17 21:32 ` Justin Forbes
2021-11-17 23:32   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2021-11-17 23:50     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-18  0:16       ` Kees Cook
2021-11-18  6:26         ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-18  8:14           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-18  8:12         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-11-18 17:17           ` Kees Cook
2021-11-18  8:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18  8:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18  9:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18 10:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18 12:11             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-19  2:04               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-19  9:29                 ` [PATCH] x86: Pin task-stack in __get_wchan() Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-19 10:02                   ` Qi Zheng
2021-11-19 10:22                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-19 10:26                       ` Qi Zheng
2021-11-19 18:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-19 18:35                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-22  9:32                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-22 16:14                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-18  5:45 ` [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZYLC9D6zpUneYtn@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
    --cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kubrick@fgv6.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@kernelci.org \
    --cc=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.