From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C8EFC433F5 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F75418F2; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:09:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 7F75418F2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1637935849; bh=Yp7ZWaRLZqo2+/HaAB8QKWWqg0JyRavrODFXqssH2Og=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=D0QuZJHJIMJjgUKbbrkGqEf0eoxaKLTQ7Gs7M83ArlJAZr8meync9geEmXKyTZ143 03lviC7y/oDCv3p2K1clPVdRBzze3MuwpidcElj8kki3Df00lPYl5P35oyADxMcS7+ Dmg8tCnN7+p29+idPqUbuAXyn5PphAbLZsRf28zw= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D59F801F7; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:09:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id B34B8F80212; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:09:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46800F80166 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:09:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 46800F80166 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eQn3+544" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1CE6227D; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F494C93056; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:09:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1637935786; bh=Yp7ZWaRLZqo2+/HaAB8QKWWqg0JyRavrODFXqssH2Og=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eQn3+5441B/ajChtiLu15N5k6PSLbI1xHwXrReloGCO/0G5EVPptg+xq2WvchSIlQ tt/DjGA9xZvlmRAzlFArOKf4rSuWkNyZWVt0/FHLhWuz968xrujX6EqboWj7wHSIXt 4VzjdtggVANSI8x6ilLgLGSsmag5p7QzQbvun0KCAPdSojL//I+l6kanRxKQtBLd5O N7wfjyYNAHmOaP7WN6hTvJKg+jo0++6ycbyEZNAgb+U4lZjfZQUGXNi/8Wzii5qzuo kGiDnyNP6gQZ4vlSzdQ/OmR/z2OYfRk3+NmBPZqahMKWRTldeXeuPTS41n0nHDw2ak C194HiOZMJjBg== Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:09:39 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Kuninori Morimoto Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: soc-dai: update snd_soc_dai_delay() to snd_soc_pcm_dai_delay() Message-ID: References: <877dd8y26l.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <875yssy25z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <2cc78158-e288-e949-594f-0ab939a35942@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Du4t0Y5KMQdT5MbR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: You fill a much-needed gap. Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart , Cezary Rojewski , Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , Jie Yang , Linux-ALSA , Hans de Goede , Gu Shengxian X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --Du4t0Y5KMQdT5MbR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:41:38PM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Sorry for my late response. > (It was PC replace week) No worries, hope the new PC is working well! > >> I would think it's more accurate to update the delay information while= =20 > >> dealing with the hw_ptr update, no? > > Morimoto-san? > I think your opinion is very correct. > But this patch-set is for "cleanup/refactoring", > and your opinion is for "add new feature", I think. Hrm, right - this isn't making anything better or worse in terms of the accuracy, it's just moving things around so Pierre's suggestion is a separate thing. --Du4t0Y5KMQdT5MbR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmGg6qIACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B23gf/TS2f8Uhwz/3aBj7dhy2c1WyFcZPt8ykzlZ9OTzJO5yO0q221pX2VOO2+ NC+ODlQFCGpYSLTBkXp+f98XdSunkPj1EQPdRxDococSfxUaUYRCyr+JEiR7vokR upJg3Yflizx6A9V4lpJ42dyt4L49bHwGz9mhEmRNPmoOq6NlOI7S1b1aZRc1msSF mu6DeoC9B/6dHuScaiDYXmK/FfinWrwDZoihD71jtEAsrCsdPnnAly1fNGSr5pH1 drbh0Wh8ooGIygoWwOJBpW6uP8oJDKcOgvh7pJUxD6xjrjtTDyh8YhVVe32XejkC IGVPaLg9Mn32Pa6Ta+DHFEbmM9SScw== =eRAB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Du4t0Y5KMQdT5MbR--