All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests: tpm2: Reset the dictionary attack lock
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:19:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YadMHU0scgKvCTMV@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YadLaHB0oJZYTMbh@iki.fi>

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:16:11PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:26:12PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > 
> > On 11/29/21 18:43, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 11:10:52PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Reset the dictionary attack lock to avoid the following types of test
> > > > failures after running the test 2 times:
> > > > 
> > > > ======================================================================
> > > > ERROR: test_unseal_with_wrong_policy (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > >    File "/root/linux-ima-namespaces/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py", line 105, in test_unseal_with_wrong_policy
> > > >      blob = self.client.seal(self.root_key, data, auth, policy_dig)
> > > >    File "/root/linux-ima-namespaces/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2.py", line 620, in seal
> > > >      rsp = self.send_cmd(cmd)
> > > >    File "/root/linux-ima-namespaces/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2.py", line 397, in send_cmd
> > > >      raise ProtocolError(cc, rc)
> > > > tpm2.ProtocolError: TPM_RC_LOCKOUT: cc=0x00000153, rc=0x00000921
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py | 2 ++
> > > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py
> > > > index e63a37819978..ad6f54c01adf 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py
> > > > @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ class SmokeTest(unittest.TestCase):
> > > >           except:
> > > >               self.client.flush_context(handle)
> > > >               raise
> > > > +        finally:
> > > > +            self.client.reset_da_lock()
> > > >           self.assertEqual(rc, tpm2.TPM2_RC_POLICY_FAIL)
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.31.1
> > > > 
> > > I don't agree with this as a DA lock has legit use. This would be adequate
> > > for systems dedicated for kernel testing only.
> > 
> > The problem is this particular test case I am patching here causes the above
> > test failures upon rerun. We are testing the driver here presumably and not
> > the TPM2, so I think we should leave the TPM2 as cleaned up as possible,
> > thus my suggestion is to reset the DA lock and we won't hear any complaints
> > after that.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > > We could make this available in the folder where TPM2 tests are:
> > > 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/tpm2-scripts.git/tree/tpm2-reset-da-lock
> > 
> > 
> > The tss packages also have command line tools to reset the DA lock, but it
> > shouldn't be necessary to use them after running a **driver** test case.
> 
> If you speak about TSS, please alway say which one :-)
> 
> Adding non-volatile state changes explicitly is to a test case is both

A typo, should be:

"Adding non-volatile state changes explicitly to a test case is both"

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-01 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-28  4:10 [PATCH v4 0/2] selftests: tpm2: Determine available PCR bank Stefan Berger
2021-11-28  4:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Stefan Berger
2021-11-29 23:39   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-24  1:12     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-13 18:04       ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-15 15:53         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-01-15 17:02           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-11-28  4:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests: tpm2: Reset the dictionary attack lock Stefan Berger
2021-11-29 23:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-11-30  0:26     ` Stefan Berger
2021-12-01 10:16       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-12-01 10:19         ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-12-01 14:52         ` Stefan Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YadMHU0scgKvCTMV@iki.fi \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.