All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	Virtio-Dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Michael Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Mikheev <amikheev@nvidia.com>,
	Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>, Oren Duer <oren@nvidia.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Bodong Wang <bodong@nvidia.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:44:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaiVhNMNBAhbhzvr@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsUmOvJrQtrNosqOdMKxtFS91hkcBRJjxGeMyScjdduAg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10471 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:40:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:56 AM Eugenio Perez Martin
> <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 AM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:57:28AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 在 2021/11/24 下午7:20, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:00:20PM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:17 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 08:58:05PM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:00 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > +the driver MAY change avail_idx in the case of split virtqueue, but the new
> > > > > > > > > > +avail_idx MUST be within used_idx and used_idx plus virtqueue size.
> > > > > > > > > I'm trying to understand how this would work. Available buffers may be
> > > > > > > > > consumed out-of-order unless VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER was negotiated, so the
> > > > > > > > > avail ring could contain something like:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >    avail.ring = [Used, Not used, Used, Not used, ...]
> > > > > > > > >                                                  ^--- avail.idx
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > There are num_not_used = avail.idx - used.idx requests that are "Not
> > > > > > > > > used" in avail.ring.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Does this mean the driver can rewind avail.idx by counting the number of
> > > > > > > > > "Not used" buffers and skipping "Used" buffers until it reaches
> > > > > > > > > num_not_used "Not used" buffers?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm going to also drop the "resume" part for the next version because
> > > > > > > > it adds extra complexity not actually needed, and it can be achieved
> > > > > > > > with a full reset in a simpler way.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But I'll explain it below with your examples. Long story short, the
> > > > > > > > driver only can rewind the available descriptors that are still in the
> > > > > > > > available ring, and the device must flush the ones that cannot recover
> > > > > > > > from the ring.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think there is a known issue with this approach:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Imagine a vring with 4 elements:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >    avail.ring = [0,        1,    2,    3   ]
> > > > > > > > >                  Not used, used, used, used
> > > > > > > > >                                             ^--- avail.idx
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since the device has used 3 buffers the driver now has space to make
> > > > > > > > > more buffers available. avail.idx wraps back to the start of the ring
> > > > > > > > > and the driver overwrites the first element ("Not used"):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >    avail.ring = [1,        N/A,  N/A,  N/A]
> > > > > > > > >                  Not used, N/A,  N/A,  N/A
> > > > > > > > >                           ^--- avail.idx
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since vring descriptor 0 is still in use the driver chose descriptor 1
> > > > > > > > > for the new available buffer.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Now we stop the device, knowing there are two buffers available that
> > > > > > > > > have not been used. But avail.ring[] actually only contains the new
> > > > > > > > > buffer (vring descriptor 1) that we made available because we overwrote
> > > > > > > > > the old avail.ring[] element (vring descriptor 0).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What now? Where does the device reset its internal avail_idx to?
> > > > > > > > To be on the same page, in qemu the device maintains two "internal
> > > > > > > > avail idx": shadow_avail_idx (last seen in the available ring, could
> > > > > > > > be 4 in this case) and last_avail_idx (next descriptor to fetch from
> > > > > > > > avail, 2). The device must forget shadow_avail_idx and flush the
> > > > > > > > descriptors that cannot recover (0). So last_avail_idx is now 3. Now
> > > > > > > > it can stop.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The proposal allows the device to fail descriptor 0 in a
> > > > > > > > device-specific way, but I think now it was a bad choice.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The driver cannot move the device's last_avail_idx in this operation:
> > > > > > > > The device is simply forced to flush used ones to the used ring or
> > > > > > > > descriptor ring in a packed vq case. So the device's internal
> > > > > > > > avail_idx == used_idx == 3. When the device resumes, it's still 3.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The device must keep its last_avail_idx through stop and resume cycle.
> > > > > > > Are you saying that all buffers avail->ring[i % ring_size] must be
> > > > > > > completed by the device before the STOP bit is reported where i <=
> > > > > > > last_avail_idx?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This means the driver can modify avail->ring[i % ring_size] where
> > > > > > > avail_idx >= i > used_idx.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, That's correct. The driver could also decide to modify the
> > > > > > descriptor table instead of the avail ring to do so, but I think the
> > > > > > point is clear now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Somehow it is thought after the premise that the out of order
> > > > > "Somehow it is thought after the premise" == "there is a fundamental
> > > > > design assumption"?
> > > > >
> > > > > > descriptors are descriptors that the device must wait to complete
> > > > > > before the pause anyway. Depending on the device, it might prefer to
> > > > > > cancel them, to wait for them, etc. The interesting descriptors to
> > > > > > rewind are the ones that have not reached the device (i > used_idx).
> > > > > > The driver can do whatever it wants with them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we assume all the in-flight descriptors are idempotent and we
> > > > > > expose a way for the device to expose them, the model is way more
> > > > > > simpler than this.
> > > > > The constraint that the device has to mark all previously seen "avail"
> > > > > buffers as "used" is problematic. It makes STOP visible to the driver
> > > > > when the device has to fail requests.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think we need some clarification here on the driver. For doing migration,
> > > > some kind of mediation is a must.
> > > >
> > > > As we've discussed in the previous versions of this proposal, the VMM
> > > > usually won't advertise the STOP feature to guest if we don't want to do
> > > > nested live migration (if we do we can shadow it anyhow).
> > > >
> > > > So from the guest point of view it won't see neither STOP nor the inflight
> > > > descriptors.
> > >
> > > That's not how I understand STOP semantics. See below.
> > >
> > > > > That is incompatible with how
> > > > > devices behave across live migration today. If you want to use STOP for
> > > > > live migration then it's probably necessary to rethink this constraint.
> > > > >
> > > > > QEMU's virtio-blk and virtio-scsi device models put failed requests onto
> > > > > a list so they can be retried after problems with the underlying storage
> > > > > have been resolved (e.g. more disk space becomes available and ENOSPC
> > > > > requests can be retried).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A question, I think for those "failure" it's actually not visible from the
> > > > drive? If this is true, from the spec point of view, there are still
> > > > inflight. The VMM may choose to migrate them to the destination and
> > > > re-submit them there. This works more like vhost re-connection.
> > >
> > > That's how I would like STOP to work, but the semantics seem to be
> > > different. Eugenio can correct me if this is wrong:
> > >
> > > All avail descriptors before the last used descriptor must be marked
> > > used before the device reports the STOP bit. For example:
> > >
> > >   avail.ring = [1, 2, 3, 4]
> > >   used.ring = [3]
> > >
> > > The driver writes the STOP bit. Now the device MUST complete 1 and 2
> > > before reporting the STOP bit. Therefore we cannot keep 1 and 2
> > > in flight but it can keep 4 in flight. The problem is that this
> > > conflicts with the virtio-blk/scsi failed requests behavior where 1 and
> > > 2 should be kept in flight and migrated.
> 
> Ok, so I think I get your comments on the vhost. Regarding the failed
> requests behaviour, it looks like it's an implementation specific
> feature which is out of the virtio spec. If we want to preserve the
> behaviour, we need to extend the virtio spec.
> 
> Some quick thoughts:
> 
> 1) extend the virtio-blk error codes
> 2) allow to configure the behaviour (report, ignore, stop) on error
> via config space or control vq
> 3) signal the error via config interrupt
> 
> With all of the above, it may provide a virtio-blk that is fully
> compatible with what is provided by qemu. Considering its complexity,
> I wonder if we can start from something simple and build the features
> gradually. If I was not wrong, we can start by exposing something to
> make it work like vhost-(user)-blk. When all of those facilities were
> implemented in the spec, vhost-vDPA got those facilities as well. Then
> it looks to me it's sufficient to define:
> 
> 1) STOP
> 2) indices state synchronization
> 3) inflight descriptors report (is this a must?)
> 
> Or even 3) could be optional, to make things easier, having 1) and 2)
> makes it sufficient to migrate the networking devices. And we can do
> 3) on top?

I suggest:

1. STOP
2. vhost-style get_vring_base() to fetch last_avail_idx
3. Device state save/load

Under this model the driver can rewind the avail ring, but only back to
last_avail_idx. This gives the device the freedom to keep in-flight
requests like virtio-blk/scsi's failed requests list. Information about
those requests will be transferred as part of device state save/load.

This patch series just needs to define STOP. Rewinding descriptors
requires a new get_vring_base()-style operation while the device is in
the stopped state. This can be proposed separately. Device state
save/load can also be proposed separately.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-11 18:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit Eugenio Pérez
2021-11-11 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] content: Explain better the status clearing bits Eugenio Pérez
2021-11-12  3:46   ` Jason Wang
2021-11-12 11:41     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-12 10:34   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-11-12 11:41     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-11 18:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: introduce STOP status bit Eugenio Pérez
2021-11-12  4:18   ` Jason Wang
2021-11-12 10:50     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-15  4:08       ` Jason Wang
2021-11-15 18:16         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-16  6:56           ` Jason Wang
2021-11-16 14:50             ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-17  3:27               ` Jason Wang
2021-11-17  8:08                 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-18  3:27                   ` Jason Wang
2021-11-18 15:59   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-18 19:58     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-23 12:16       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-23 17:00         ` [virtio-dev] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-24 11:20           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-24 16:41             ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-29 10:32               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-25  2:57             ` Jason Wang
2021-11-29 10:29               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-29 16:55                 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-12-01 10:21                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-12-02  8:30                     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-12-02  2:40                   ` Jason Wang
2021-12-02  9:44                     ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2021-12-03  2:09                       ` Jason Wang
2021-11-18 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-18 16:49   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-23 11:33     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-23 16:19       ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-24 15:26         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-24 16:58           ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-25  3:05         ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25  7:24           ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-25  7:38             ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25  9:01               ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-11-25  9:10                 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
     [not found]                 ` <CACGkMEvD+Z7cYszhMzBsnEaC0K0kfnHxzFDEfjT_qLOFiMR-XA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-11-26  8:26                   ` Eugenio Perez Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YaiVhNMNBAhbhzvr@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=amikheev@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bodong@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=oren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.