All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: free exchange changeset on failures
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:25:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yan+ncm6Vc8bdl/5@debian9.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95ce11234dd6911a433b1a016e4d4194856212b5.1638523623.git.johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:55:33AM -0800, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Fstests runs on my VMs have show several kmemleak reports like the following.
> 
>   unreferenced object 0xffff88811ae59080 (size 64):
>     comm "xfs_io", pid 12124, jiffies 4294987392 (age 6.368s)
>     hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>       00 c0 1c 00 00 00 00 00 ff cf 1c 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>       90 97 e5 1a 81 88 ff ff 90 97 e5 1a 81 88 ff ff  ................
>     backtrace:
>       [<00000000ac0176d2>] ulist_add_merge+0x60/0x150 [btrfs]
>       [<0000000076e9f312>] set_state_bits+0x86/0xc0 [btrfs]
>       [<0000000014fe73d6>] set_extent_bit+0x270/0x690 [btrfs]
>       [<000000004f675208>] set_record_extent_bits+0x19/0x20 [btrfs]
>       [<00000000b96137b1>] qgroup_reserve_data+0x274/0x310 [btrfs]
>       [<0000000057e9dcbb>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x5c/0xa0 [btrfs]
>       [<0000000019c4511d>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1b/0xa0 [btrfs]
>       [<000000006d37e007>] btrfs_dio_iomap_begin+0x415/0x970 [btrfs]
>       [<00000000fb8a74b8>] iomap_iter+0x161/0x1e0
>       [<0000000071dff6ff>] __iomap_dio_rw+0x1df/0x700
>       [<000000002567ba53>] iomap_dio_rw+0x5/0x20
>       [<0000000072e555f8>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x290/0x530 [btrfs]
>       [<000000005eb3d845>] new_sync_write+0x106/0x180
>       [<000000003fb505bf>] vfs_write+0x24d/0x2f0
>       [<000000009bb57d37>] __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x69/0xa0
>       [<000000003eba3fdf>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
> 
> In case brtfs_qgroup_reserve_data() or btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata()
> fail the allocated extent_changeset will not be freed.
> 
> So in btrfs_check_data_free_space() and btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space()
> free the allocated extent_changeset to get rid of the allocated memory.
> 
> Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>


Looks good, and it ran successfully on my fstests run with kmemleak as well.

Just a note worth adding, is that the issue currently only happens in the
direct IO write path, but only after my change "btrfs: fix ENOSPC failure
when attempting direct IO write into NOCOW range", and also at
defrag_one_locked_target() (haven't checked since when). Every other place
is always calling extent_changeset_free() even if its call to
btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() or btrfs_check_data_free_space() has failed.

With that, which probably David can add, it looks good:

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Thanks.

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c b/fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c
> index bca438c7c972..fb46a28f5065 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c
> @@ -143,10 +143,13 @@ int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  
>  	/* Use new btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data to reserve precious data space. */
>  	ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, reserved, start, len);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota(fs_info, len);
> -	else
> +		extent_changeset_free(*reserved);
> +		*reserved = NULL;
> +	} else {
>  		ret = 0;
> +	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -452,8 +455,11 @@ int btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  	ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(inode, len);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, *reserved, start, len);
> +		extent_changeset_free(*reserved);
> +		*reserved = NULL;
> +	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03 10:55 [PATCH] btrfs: free exchange changeset on failures Johannes Thumshirn
2021-12-03 11:25 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2021-12-06 17:48 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yan+ncm6Vc8bdl/5@debian9.Home \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.