From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBA3C433F5 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235506AbhLSJsU (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 04:48:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47372 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229585AbhLSJsR (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 04:48:17 -0500 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD49C061574 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 01:48:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 10:48:12 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1639907294; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TJo5ngX//6aS070Xxb0LcQst4uSm8Z+tELD2m1er/tc=; b=zOywKPcwtHuPZZVNCH7B7ay6DbcY5nzK8VyAYl8HwEC+FNc10PDCkfeoI4E3GOxT6gJpEf 1rSD7bg7UoTI5CkwFTixwa6lrzSNZWLXLsU1jVCAayxt5Kj8HerNUz2yo1rBuOq9FOJ1rd RJmBgpRsMJrZrzQ+jOnmK79GT2MbM4ejm+h80uHn27CM0j0UtLf/6ioUQ9YIaQSVh1lsD9 02qwKilgSGMv8VWQsJXY0PNIEJc27VQ/8YjiBRGgRO3jrgnZghwarjtQt96FnpOtaPpnQx F0EU6d4Vu6MaA+zgovvrZJ7HA9Cg8skjcbnyKqjxWb6JXARJQ4d6pgRzGv7ntQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1639907294; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TJo5ngX//6aS070Xxb0LcQst4uSm8Z+tELD2m1er/tc=; b=+tpQS6k+NRZeRslMdggt5OtVWSlHjywz6DX3BLGIokkLTXonxNKFJwqnvIxUkJPg54gYQA s4Wt8i/PMzPiAbBQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Herbert Xu Cc: Jason@zx2c4.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] random: Defer processing of randomness on PREEMPT_RT. Message-ID: References: <20211207201037.h46573oa5nfj33xq@linutronix.de> <20211217022338.GA19411@gondor.apana.org.au> <20211218032409.GA11425@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20211218032409.GA11425@gondor.apana.org.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-12-18 14:24:09 [+1100], Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > I'm sorry, I can't connect the dots here. I was trying to explain that > > for the lock in question it is not possible to spin-wait without > > disabling interrupts first. >=20 > That's precisely the problem the socket lock was designed to > solve. =E2=80=A6 > Take a look at lock_sock/release_sock and bh_lock_sock/bh_unlock_sock > in net/core/sock.c. That one. I find the semantic difficult to understand. Some BH-user check sock_owned_by_user(), some don't. However, a semaphore should work. The atomic user would do down_trylock() while preemptible caller would invoke down() and sleep until the lock is available. Let me check if that works here=E2=80=A6 > Cheers, Sebastian