From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECE0C4332F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237886AbiAFKXR (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 05:23:17 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:51770 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237872AbiAFKXQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 05:23:16 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8011411D4; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 02:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.10.56]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E38C3F774; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 02:23:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:23:06 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: jszhang3@mail.ustc.edu.cn, tglx@linutronix.de, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, michal.lkml@markovi.net, ndesaulniers@google.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, tongtiangen@huawei.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] riscv: extable: add `type` and `data` fields Message-ID: References: <20211118152155.GB9977@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 07:21:26PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:21:55 PST (-0800), mark.rutland@arm.com wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 07:42:49PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:26:05 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > Hi Mark, Thomas, > > > > > > x86 and arm64 version of sort_relative_table routine are the same, I want to > > > unify them, and then use the common function for riscv, but I'm not sure > > > which name is better. Could you please suggest? > > > > I sent a patch last week which unifies them as > > sort_relative_table_with_data(): > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211108114220.32796-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/ > > > > Thomas, are you happy with that patch? > > > > With your ack it could go via the riscv tree for v5.17 as a preparatory > > cleanup in this series. > > > > Maybe we could get it in as a cleanup for v5.16-rc{2,3} ? > > I don't see anything on that thread, and looks like last time I had to touch > sorttable I just took it via the RISC-V tree. I went ahead and put Mark's > patch, along with this patch set, on my for-next. FWIW, that sounds good to me. Thanks for picking that up! > I had to fix up a few minor issues, so LMK if anything went off the rails. I assume that was just for this patch set, as I couldn't spot any change to my patch in the riscv for-next branch. Thanks, Mark. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF5F1C433EF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:23:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=GQ6GVCvk6FpJtOtOmuHydvstolGDHtAcaOKcugAkNxw=; b=zaZXL4sCUY7gca YY+YVZYCRwBULuXsZVvT3Cl00+WeuyYD6ZHTVjdCKy2i5oWNk8RnA4WKLCS+gJzxUeb7iZmpTxd5J 6JLIk+YVM/YMw2GCjlLkrMKmLx03YveH8g5qTE657YvTpc7ayDhzLm4GAxkvWAsLv01aAix96sexD jUUv45l/2aqXpHojxfllr6KN0JgnSCBEpBp1rKIt/reulsDKcwvn0oa3jumE/F9b6OfzkM037okm6 /uWqhPmbiW2AlFG8yf6p/P1xPiUtlR0Qwky9C/kJSFPe3R7E0h6g2oHT+fxdMw5UK3KKKCqdVREmv n3DkRF2cZMtMmT8jd1ow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n5PvV-00HL1e-6v; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:23:21 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n5PvS-00HL0m-Bt for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:23:19 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8011411D4; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 02:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.10.56]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E38C3F774; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 02:23:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:23:06 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: jszhang3@mail.ustc.edu.cn, tglx@linutronix.de, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, michal.lkml@markovi.net, ndesaulniers@google.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, tongtiangen@huawei.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] riscv: extable: add `type` and `data` fields Message-ID: References: <20211118152155.GB9977@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220106_022318_483451_15B63395 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 07:21:26PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:21:55 PST (-0800), mark.rutland@arm.com wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 07:42:49PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:26:05 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > Hi Mark, Thomas, > > > > > > x86 and arm64 version of sort_relative_table routine are the same, I want to > > > unify them, and then use the common function for riscv, but I'm not sure > > > which name is better. Could you please suggest? > > > > I sent a patch last week which unifies them as > > sort_relative_table_with_data(): > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211108114220.32796-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/ > > > > Thomas, are you happy with that patch? > > > > With your ack it could go via the riscv tree for v5.17 as a preparatory > > cleanup in this series. > > > > Maybe we could get it in as a cleanup for v5.16-rc{2,3} ? > > I don't see anything on that thread, and looks like last time I had to touch > sorttable I just took it via the RISC-V tree. I went ahead and put Mark's > patch, along with this patch set, on my for-next. FWIW, that sounds good to me. Thanks for picking that up! > I had to fix up a few minor issues, so LMK if anything went off the rails. I assume that was just for this patch set, as I couldn't spot any change to my patch in the riscv for-next branch. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv