From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182DEC433EF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231891AbiAGUYT (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:24:19 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]:44730 "EHLO dfw.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232174AbiAGUYS (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:24:18 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF8061FE6 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03700C36AED; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1641587057; bh=UAfnoL86ZB98XRycStRMpkOz27mbd1CkSVdgWDPqoVw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CxkoS7+Aruk4/7+DqCXCZLAKViPpVIKZ8uuz2N0VissXeC5dmsrNGJYQMzstfKqOI qx0035OhIEnWvgUoYFR7FSJohaEz7RiyTGpo5d8KCi2gCWAv7RgPx61b4LQ3CB5cAF Ydj5T5Y2hK7fAUOXwXTcv/byHv9SQeThwWiU8ktKIW8WH6z0Hzu99KiFJzioskuug6 OWmXt1HANu88VFJpunrjjaoFSkz0uddR+MBM0nYjHPnxHaDzgtjPXeTvXzVc/FydaQ beAL6cWYZqSg3Wc2VguIik0UTma2i8LQCRBDqk2v3GIldXITLUyKLCxD2ltWpqSmY3 +JD0M6V4P7MCQ== Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:24:10 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Konstantin Kharlamov Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter" Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Konstantin Kharlamov , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20220106122452.18719-1-wsakernel!org> <5849ab287df1b06e141d87bbffdbcd627e999578.camel@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5849ab287df1b06e141d87bbffdbcd627e999578.camel@yandex.ru> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov Thanks! > By the way, shouldn't the patch include a field=20 >=20 > Cc: # 5.14+ Yes, but I add such lines only when applying to my tree. If I add it when sending out patches, the mail gets CCed to stable although the patch is not upstream yet. --S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmHYoWYACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbyBxAAmoMZVtND7b+hYvwEhq6vE1IWvlD+tkGACi94UWfnxie12sV1lBgFQuth lBcs1jvh1AUyht/cgN7zJP4hYoGpAUFmITs5lxx/JKBYXGMVVqMy/UFRSEgBxfJ0 ZM0F5YjCOn811vHck+Z9rpPfJcaqv3i0Ox5sPHQtr+LoKkLWQwgcvtjcnqGje0nH bTE+TU+GzRBXr+kDlERSrGDOLfGOLvccwhfEWrPCHlUi6SdmgoO4LI88pjuzIMYO AMYUI+TvCyjWcSizhoyX76GDphU/zgFgUvvlkhwnzBmuWrOYIhRik0EDIyr3FEld mQQ9scebHvrDLj9JTj22TmW6qS3MaDouSxLyb2SBvczx44kB55Vu48V1Ta1v6b9R RD0WOP1NR5X2CUHIQN90hOF4Df/HfNa2b09nbS2x5TwUVvsGl56+Xu0N2ijWMgJt 3V8Y4h3iU6CxnIo4OihDdfaCWRMTaffA1zrbhGTvcobrZiqY5EAGGojxYZTjEySY WTTraD1YRwBeKKu5kAbd5zN20hXyqZV5GSpd0P4lpDU6AtJ6ANf9F6Wlacp9Bxtz 67EsjrxTg/bZEsWYUwc3BNRgAZej/q8orXr/fLhirphGCLFtIecU3YL4jcALcZap 4yaJRgqinw84Z01huSBEP//sOyvIPgCuiTKQgWz2WR7FMzsQU1k= =JJG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3834C4332F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2408710EBB2; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BCF510E6F7 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD0D61F91; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03700C36AED; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 20:24:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1641587057; bh=UAfnoL86ZB98XRycStRMpkOz27mbd1CkSVdgWDPqoVw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CxkoS7+Aruk4/7+DqCXCZLAKViPpVIKZ8uuz2N0VissXeC5dmsrNGJYQMzstfKqOI qx0035OhIEnWvgUoYFR7FSJohaEz7RiyTGpo5d8KCi2gCWAv7RgPx61b4LQ3CB5cAF Ydj5T5Y2hK7fAUOXwXTcv/byHv9SQeThwWiU8ktKIW8WH6z0Hzu99KiFJzioskuug6 OWmXt1HANu88VFJpunrjjaoFSkz0uddR+MBM0nYjHPnxHaDzgtjPXeTvXzVc/FydaQ beAL6cWYZqSg3Wc2VguIik0UTma2i8LQCRBDqk2v3GIldXITLUyKLCxD2ltWpqSmY3 +JD0M6V4P7MCQ== Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:24:10 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Konstantin Kharlamov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter" Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Konstantin Kharlamov , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20220106122452.18719-1-wsakernel!org> <5849ab287df1b06e141d87bbffdbcd627e999578.camel@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5849ab287df1b06e141d87bbffdbcd627e999578.camel@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" --S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov Thanks! > By the way, shouldn't the patch include a field=20 >=20 > Cc: # 5.14+ Yes, but I add such lines only when applying to my tree. If I add it when sending out patches, the mail gets CCed to stable although the patch is not upstream yet. --S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmHYoWYACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbyBxAAmoMZVtND7b+hYvwEhq6vE1IWvlD+tkGACi94UWfnxie12sV1lBgFQuth lBcs1jvh1AUyht/cgN7zJP4hYoGpAUFmITs5lxx/JKBYXGMVVqMy/UFRSEgBxfJ0 ZM0F5YjCOn811vHck+Z9rpPfJcaqv3i0Ox5sPHQtr+LoKkLWQwgcvtjcnqGje0nH bTE+TU+GzRBXr+kDlERSrGDOLfGOLvccwhfEWrPCHlUi6SdmgoO4LI88pjuzIMYO AMYUI+TvCyjWcSizhoyX76GDphU/zgFgUvvlkhwnzBmuWrOYIhRik0EDIyr3FEld mQQ9scebHvrDLj9JTj22TmW6qS3MaDouSxLyb2SBvczx44kB55Vu48V1Ta1v6b9R RD0WOP1NR5X2CUHIQN90hOF4Df/HfNa2b09nbS2x5TwUVvsGl56+Xu0N2ijWMgJt 3V8Y4h3iU6CxnIo4OihDdfaCWRMTaffA1zrbhGTvcobrZiqY5EAGGojxYZTjEySY WTTraD1YRwBeKKu5kAbd5zN20hXyqZV5GSpd0P4lpDU6AtJ6ANf9F6Wlacp9Bxtz 67EsjrxTg/bZEsWYUwc3BNRgAZej/q8orXr/fLhirphGCLFtIecU3YL4jcALcZap 4yaJRgqinw84Z01huSBEP//sOyvIPgCuiTKQgWz2WR7FMzsQU1k= =JJG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S/gKSxHGeHhRRdpK--