From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E235CC433F5 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232882AbiAOLJZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 06:09:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43602 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229569AbiAOLJY (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 06:09:24 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAED2C061574; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:09:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id l12-20020a7bc34c000000b003467c58cbdfso12361721wmj.2; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:09:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wbtngQJLC1AXKVgmXqeSN04h1xtyl3WUPRPOVydw+k8=; b=n5rhOUPcZYStYqN2IderhavLDac2yeTnQ2qpc7mx6lVoy54aY5DJtafiYOtF6Wrrx3 Hz4DSCheKQPYUfKQJScUovIh8H2KnTFJYSAcVKlQ69Wv6kRgoYI2X5YieKLIb6Bz5t+l oA/jfbTdf39j77UzArDMEKsTt2nxrhqWF+jNNqRFYgG+q9Qiv1mDbGQMGNQ/3ZmYeH8u dqns0Vf+DeLmahsW6R94A3bIWPeDFJBzR+O5SbcK5Abp9Fq+C7nV6xBehwIuJSE8DR0Z VbVkdW5ZnMvTjv90Yv4QYG3MM/o1zuNWdq4vVD7BABq9L3+J5PF06BLWG4fFAqlMMq37 AbDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wbtngQJLC1AXKVgmXqeSN04h1xtyl3WUPRPOVydw+k8=; b=0CSCV2BX+hqlmwNcE/dJL3/P58XZFSfF+hf6oCwyndqZSi0FPZKUK4iS+EUKrKJCCK VF82xZvCFGlUxJeLxZJZONSsT/o/AQyye5jCldTX6YMAzTw04AeXa5oJr7f8tiZQQmzL 6ZwOLAv+Dm0KxeyUlqUtqJngreb+mlg/Aar6pxiy0HfBTKoktQPFus7kC8fAE1T9Bovh 9efUBU42mWV27d8ImA4KoOA547BE5jGTMSwwUwN9SUdwNJZ+XFp6Ak1I/JH7VU5shPDV xWojtsjyI9eZdjhB/jhru3hqIgfyPLSx4pIq9EKlW5PCdx8dcOJ/jxeTDQgsFc0CZZcx tD7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533w62W18UaTzdQPcZGWnTIQW1I5MElwpkmChXAaNV9Tv/7ERH4I mx2xNipCnILFpybtERCiCKjXcbcfJPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPD33H1ytFI+ReUajL78kwoPIPb75CbtKQHtbwo4aYG+YtbiW8AgdW6jkHcfP16ofpaYqBvQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f1cf:: with SMTP id z15mr11733427wro.134.1642244962477; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:09:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z14sm5035055wrh.39.2022.01.15.03.09.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:09:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:09:20 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/18] 5.4.172-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220114081541.465841464@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220114081541.465841464@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:16:07AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.172 release. > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/625 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip