From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A6DC433F5 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374F23C96F5 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:20:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A363C9232 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:19:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497F36002DE for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:19:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4577E21903; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:19:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1642756797; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/SdE2BP9EoXrSaSchtg6y/5KVik3O1xfIOVhz4P7Mmo=; b=RGeeVTVJlfulauqWp8MPyj342NSFzWYnsnvXXGJhObudJqVJGk01UihtViBJdfA1ge/mxn 4ZrNoXmt4D88mqq5bWTrMCD7SjnYE+IWl8r9am8s7OH+Ql+txQwFtf/jmEamNqfMNZLf1r XfbbTx2IKYcccAE2DqAJFq0XErLZ3ec= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1642756797; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/SdE2BP9EoXrSaSchtg6y/5KVik3O1xfIOVhz4P7Mmo=; b=HEvNi9xezxrhqdP78yVh8zz98uwY0SpD4q8EtLR00MEex58iakUeNiPGCm5LeAV/k7dVWg 82N5klAtgzcC+3AA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A1713C1A; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id QnnSBr166mFoTgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:19:57 +0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:19:55 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis , ltp@lists.linux.it Message-ID: References: <20220120150421.26639-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] Reduce needed memory by the dio_read test X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, ... > > But I'm not sure about the -s 5M part, the file size was always 128MB > > before and reducing it to 5M sounds like too much. On my machine that > > reduces the testing time from about one minute to a few seconds, that sounds > > like change that is too radical without further explanation. If we want > > to run the test with smaller file size I would go for 64M, that reduces > > the runtime to half without reducing the changes for triggering a bug > > too much. > Good catch. > I'm also going to verify ADSP075 dio_sparse -w 518192k -s 518192k -n 1000 > from ltp-aiodio.part2. Cyril's suggestion is to use '-n 1' to emulate > only single children in previous implementation. No, this is wrong. Also the issue can be just a timeout. ADSP074 (uses -n 512) runs framework ~3.5 min, ADSP075 (uses -n 1000) gets killed by LTP timeout. Do we want to increase tst_test.timeout for test? Am I correct that we cannot increase based on particular input (for particular getopt value) as we cannot later update results.timeout during run? Kind regards, Petr > Kind regards, > Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp