All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] btrfs: defrag: allow defrag_one_cluster() to large extent which is not a target
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:56:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yf1azilXKXv/13lf@debian9.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6aa51c24be3675deba0c696198d2c64e6113a11f.1643961719.git.wqu@suse.com>

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:11:59PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> In the rework of btrfs_defrag_file(), we always call
> defrag_one_cluster() and increase the offset by cluster size, which is
> only 256K.
> 
> But there are cases where we have a large extent (e.g. 128M) which
> doesn't need to be defragged at all.
> 
> Before the refactor, we can directly skip the range, but now we have to
> scan that extent map again and again until the cluster moves after the
> non-target extent.
> 
> Fix the problem by allow defrag_one_cluster() to increase
> btrfs_defrag_ctrl::last_scanned to the end of an extent, if and only if
> the last extent of the cluster is not a target.
> 
> The test script looks like this:
> 
> 	mkfs.btrfs -f $dev > /dev/null
> 
> 	mount $dev $mnt
> 
> 	# As btrfs ioctl uses 32M as extent_threshold
> 	xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64M" $mnt/file1
> 	sync
> 	# Some fragemented range to defrag
> 	xfs_io -s -c "pwrite 65548k 4k" \
> 		  -c "pwrite 65544k 4k" \
> 		  -c "pwrite 65540k 4k" \
> 		  -c "pwrite 65536k 4k" \
> 		  $mnt/file1
> 	sync
> 
> 	echo "=== before ==="
> 	xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file1
> 	echo "=== after ==="
> 	btrfs fi defrag $mnt/file1
> 	sync
> 	xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" $mnt/file1
> 	umount $mnt
> 
> With extra ftrace put into defrag_one_cluster(), before the patch it
> would result tons of loops:
> 
> (As defrag_one_cluster() is inlined, the function name is its caller)
> 
>   btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816026: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=0 len=262144
>   btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816027: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=262144 len=262144
>   btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=524288 len=262144
>   btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=786432 len=262144
>   btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816028: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=1048576 len=262144
>   ...
>   btrfs-126062  [005] .....  4682.816043: btrfs_defrag_file: r/i=5/257 start=67108864 len=262144
> 
> But with this patch there will be just one loop, then directly to the
> end of the extent:
> 
>   btrfs-130471  [014] .....  5434.029558: defrag_one_cluster: r/i=5/257 start=0 len=262144
>   btrfs-130471  [014] .....  5434.029559: defrag_one_cluster: r/i=5/257 start=67108864 len=16384
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 567a662df118..999173d0925b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -1185,10 +1185,11 @@ struct defrag_target_range {
>   */
>  static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  				  const struct btrfs_defrag_ctrl *ctrl,
> -				  u64 start, u32 len, bool locked,
> -				  struct list_head *target_list)
> +				  u64 start, u32 len, u64 *last_scanned_ret,
> +				  bool locked, struct list_head *target_list)
>  {
>  	bool do_compress = ctrl->flags & BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_COMPRESS;
> +	bool last_is_target = false;
>  	u64 cur = start;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> @@ -1198,6 +1199,7 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  		bool next_mergeable = true;
>  		u64 range_len;
>  
> +		last_is_target = false;
>  		em = defrag_lookup_extent(&inode->vfs_inode, cur, locked);
>  		if (!em)
>  			break;
> @@ -1269,6 +1271,7 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  		}
>  
>  add:
> +		last_is_target = true;
>  		range_len = min(extent_map_end(em), start + len) - cur;
>  		/*
>  		 * This one is a good target, check if it can be merged into
> @@ -1312,6 +1315,17 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  			kfree(entry);
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (!ret && last_scanned_ret) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the last extent is not a target, the caller can skip to
> +		 * the end of that extent.
> +		 * Otherwise, we can only go the end of the spcified range.
> +		 */
> +		if (!last_is_target)
> +			*last_scanned_ret = cur;
> +		else
> +			*last_scanned_ret = start + len;
> +	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1382,6 +1396,7 @@ static int defrag_one_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  	const u32 sectorsize = inode->root->fs_info->sectorsize;
>  	u64 last_index = (start + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	u64 start_index = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	u64 last_scanned;
>  	unsigned int nr_pages = last_index - start_index + 1;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int i;
> @@ -1416,8 +1431,8 @@ static int defrag_one_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  	 * And this time we have extent locked already, pass @locked = true
>  	 * so that we won't relock the extent range and cause deadlock.
>  	 */
> -	ret = defrag_collect_targets(inode, ctrl, start, len, true,
> -				     &target_list);
> +	ret = defrag_collect_targets(inode, ctrl, start, len, &last_scanned,
> +				     true, &target_list);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto unlock_extent;
>  
> @@ -1434,6 +1449,8 @@ static int defrag_one_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  		list_del_init(&entry->list);
>  		kfree(entry);
>  	}
> +	if (!ret)
> +		ctrl->last_scanned = last_scanned;
>  unlock_extent:
>  	unlock_extent_cached(&inode->io_tree, start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
>  			     (last_index << PAGE_SHIFT) + PAGE_SIZE - 1,
> @@ -1461,13 +1478,14 @@ static int defrag_one_cluster(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  			      struct btrfs_defrag_ctrl *ctrl, u32 len)
>  {
>  	const u32 sectorsize = inode->root->fs_info->sectorsize;
> +	u64 orig_start = ctrl->last_scanned;

Can be made const.
It helps to read the code and avoid regressions where we update the
wrong variable by mistake - the const makes it easy to trigger.

Just a minor comment like in the previous patches. I won't make you send
another version just because of that.

I'll reply to cover letter with the review tag.

Thanks.

>  	struct defrag_target_range *entry;
>  	struct defrag_target_range *tmp;
>  	LIST_HEAD(target_list);
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = defrag_collect_targets(inode, ctrl, ctrl->last_scanned, len,
> -				     false, &target_list);
> +				     NULL, false, &target_list);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto out;
>  
> @@ -1486,6 +1504,15 @@ static int defrag_one_cluster(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  					  (ctrl->max_sectors_to_defrag -
>  					   ctrl->sectors_defragged) * sectorsize);
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * If defrag_one_range() has updated ctrl::last_scanned,
> +		 * our range may already be invalid (e.g. hole punched).
> +		 * Skip if our range is before ctrl::last_scanned, as there is
> +		 * no need to defrag the range anymore.
> +		 */
> +		if (entry->start + range_len <= ctrl->last_scanned)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (ra)
>  			page_cache_sync_readahead(inode->vfs_inode.i_mapping,
>  				ra, NULL, entry->start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> @@ -1500,6 +1527,8 @@ static int defrag_one_cluster(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>  		list_del_init(&entry->list);
>  		kfree(entry);
>  	}
> +	if (ret >= 0)
> +		ctrl->last_scanned = max(ctrl->last_scanned, orig_start + len);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1645,7 +1674,6 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_ra_state *ra,
>  		btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
> -		ctrl->last_scanned = cluster_end + 1;
>  		if (ret > 0) {
>  			ret = 0;
>  			break;
> -- 
> 2.35.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04  8:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] btrfs: defrag: don't waste CPU time on non-target extent Qu Wenruo
2022-02-04  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] btrfs: uapi: introduce BTRFS_DEFRAG_RANGE_MASK for later sanity check Qu Wenruo
2022-02-04 16:40   ` Filipe Manana
2022-02-04  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] btrfs: defrag: introduce btrfs_defrag_ctrl structure for later usage Qu Wenruo
2022-02-04  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] btrfs: defrag: use btrfs_defrag_ctrl to replace btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args for btrfs_defrag_file() Qu Wenruo
2022-02-04 16:45   ` Filipe Manana
2022-02-04  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] btrfs: defrag: make btrfs_defrag_file() to report accurate number of defragged sectors Qu Wenruo
2022-02-04  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] btrfs: defrag: allow defrag_one_cluster() to large extent which is not a target Qu Wenruo
2022-02-04 16:56   ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-02-04 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] btrfs: defrag: don't waste CPU time on non-target extent Filipe Manana
2022-02-05  0:10   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yf1azilXKXv/13lf@debian9.Home \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.