All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	seanjc@google.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] KVM: MMU: pass uses_nx directly to reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:59:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yf1pk1EEBXj0O0/p@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204115718.14934-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 06:56:56AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask has a very unintuitive way of deciding
> whether the shadow pages will use the NX bit.  The function is used in
> two cases, shadow paging and shadow NPT; shadow paging has a use for
> EFER.NX and needs to force it enabled, while shadow NPT only needs it
> depending on L1's setting.
> 
> The actual root problem here is that is_efer_nx, despite being part
> of the "base" role, only matches the format of the shadow pages in the
> NPT case.  For now, just remove the ugly variable initialization and move
> the call to reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask out of shadow_mmu_init_context.
> The parameter can then be removed after the root problem in the role
> is fixed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>

(I agree this commit makes no functional change.)

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 296f8723f9ae..9424ae90f1ef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4410,18 +4410,9 @@ static inline u64 reserved_hpa_bits(void)
>   * follow the features in guest.
>   */
>  static void reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -					struct kvm_mmu *context)
> +					struct kvm_mmu *context,
> +					bool uses_nx)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * KVM uses NX when TDP is disabled to handle a variety of scenarios,
> -	 * notably for huge SPTEs if iTLB multi-hit mitigation is enabled and
> -	 * to generate correct permissions for CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0.
> -	 * The iTLB multi-hit workaround can be toggled at any time, so assume
> -	 * NX can be used by any non-nested shadow MMU to avoid having to reset
> -	 * MMU contexts.  Note, KVM forces EFER.NX=1 when TDP is disabled.
> -	 */
> -	bool uses_nx = is_efer_nx(context) || !tdp_enabled;
> -
>  	/* @amd adds a check on bit of SPTEs, which KVM shouldn't use anyways. */
>  	bool is_amd = true;
>  	/* KVM doesn't use 2-level page tables for the shadow MMU. */
> @@ -4829,8 +4820,6 @@ static void shadow_mmu_init_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *conte
>  
>  	reset_guest_paging_metadata(vcpu, context);
>  	context->shadow_root_level = new_role.base.level;
> -
> -	reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(vcpu, context);
>  }
>  
>  static void kvm_init_shadow_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -4841,6 +4830,16 @@ static void kvm_init_shadow_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		kvm_calc_shadow_mmu_root_page_role(vcpu, regs, false);
>  
>  	shadow_mmu_init_context(vcpu, context, regs, new_role);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * KVM uses NX when TDP is disabled to handle a variety of scenarios,
> +	 * notably for huge SPTEs if iTLB multi-hit mitigation is enabled and
> +	 * to generate correct permissions for CR0.WP=0/CR4.SMEP=1/EFER.NX=0.
> +	 * The iTLB multi-hit workaround can be toggled at any time, so assume
> +	 * NX can be used by any non-nested shadow MMU to avoid having to reset
> +	 * MMU contexts.  Note, KVM forces EFER.NX=1 when TDP is disabled.
> +	 */
> +	reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(vcpu, context, true);
>  }
>  
>  static union kvm_mmu_role
> @@ -4872,6 +4871,7 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_npt_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0,
>  	__kvm_mmu_new_pgd(vcpu, nested_cr3, new_role.base);
>  
>  	shadow_mmu_init_context(vcpu, context, &regs, new_role);
> +	reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(vcpu, context, is_efer_nx(context));

Out of curiousity, how does KVM mitigate iTLB multi-hit when shadowing
NPT and the guest has not enabled EFER.NX?

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init_shadow_npt_mmu);
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 11:56 [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 01/23] KVM: MMU: pass uses_nx directly to reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 17:59   ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-02-05 14:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 16:09       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-07 21:50         ` David Matlack
2022-02-10  0:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 16:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 02/23] KVM: MMU: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:16   ` David Matlack
2022-02-09 22:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 03/23] KVM: MMU: remove valid from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:32   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 22:54   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10  9:53     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 04/23] KVM: MMU: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:41   ` David Matlack
2022-02-09 22:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/23] KVM: MMU: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 18:45   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/23] KVM: MMU: load new PGD once nested two-dimensional paging is initialized Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:18   ` David Matlack
2022-02-07 13:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 14:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-09 12:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/23] KVM: MMU: remove kvm_mmu_calc_root_page_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:32   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10  0:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10  9:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 17:29       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 17:43         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/23] KVM: MMU: rephrase unclear comment Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:38   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/23] KVM: MMU: remove "bool base_only" arguments Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 19:41   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/23] KVM: MMU: split cpu_role from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 21:57   ` David Matlack
2022-02-05 14:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 21:38       ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 11/23] KVM: MMU: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 22:10   ` David Matlack
2022-02-07 22:17     ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 12/23] KVM: MMU: remove ept_ad field Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 13/23] KVM: MMU: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 22:25   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 14/23] KVM: MMU: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 15/23] KVM: MMU: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 16/23] KVM: MMU: remove extended bits from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 17/23] KVM: MMU: remove redundant bits from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 18/23] KVM: MMU: fetch shadow EFER.NX from MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 19/23] KVM: MMU: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 20/23] KVM: MMU: pull CPU role computation to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 22:42   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 21/23] KVM: MMU: store shadow_root_level into mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 23:00   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 23:01   ` David Matlack
2022-02-04 11:57 ` [PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-07 23:02   ` David Matlack
2022-02-07 23:08 ` [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring David Matlack
2022-02-07 23:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-07 23:53     ` David Matlack
2022-02-10  1:11       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 11:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 16:55           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10 17:30             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-10 19:28               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-09 22:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-10  9:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-14 18:14   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yf1pk1EEBXj0O0/p@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.