From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CFBC433FE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240272AbiBAPkA (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:40:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41638 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234785AbiBAPj7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:39:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5AAC061714; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 07:39:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id h7so1044114wrc.5; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 07:39:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2URJrPu/e3Nm6PXx/HVm9E6NvPD3qyIMT6b1uCjGL60=; b=UTEATwhtC1TNhFJX+d5clvxusq/DMr7Y+HLCSbLNgpt7naTHqIPZ4oK5JYHbzWqllx ZiCq1uC2SwDSuW40mmCp+xXYD3g6MqkXsUC2HPRYPBaw2pJ59YoP+UjwlUB5n9WPZ3Ay bizbLEYqnH8M7F2G9LHtUaq7O61zq7mbO587hzBLPVdUuB5lSe/xZFSriNk8YWxf0hTS Hwt+oJ3X+i16M/CRKVR6x4MQ7dCBZwpoP1QlBUD/EoB1ykbLxhR8Vbwkv+E79agy8t1l oGJAqZwpHprJl9IgABfYJvF6MjliRAegsyqMkUSdDdkFN/v11O72usAEq8JVdtloPwRv PwMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2URJrPu/e3Nm6PXx/HVm9E6NvPD3qyIMT6b1uCjGL60=; b=acKnBy68r7FmLERHIgzGaVM23RrItkVX9+/5SMcIFg7uGzxhJABRyfw1eHSoGDGeXM WFcr41tI8SLIOCpUj+GucGu+wJdayZOtznog2vbJNBMdb61sry8nOA9M/k7bxautxUqQ b0DONQV2t63pqdBe6vPP+GWdBbTaCXhXoxVU8gKcA0q9n2lmy+iYQuAee+fJY3AKjEtV y0w0YGG8I5GJzOanSnxXatrAj1LD/M1qDNrizInrsy20fPIanfbixEKj+ZJ5LS+HTAoJ 6Ki5Yj2ndAixsMSkDGMhddSWKIsOs2okaFDX+WY21c7/neo2xXi8xv/09m/WrLkSX780 VVMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319Ca1WWKWcPpaGyR2CnUaECojT39pnpNWLFlf+X0+/QjG+zhTs B8Y3oD2LPnfGCnq023X8Qx8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0ID4VxWvcMiDln8+Lz2J9iQ4QPzTvISwf8/Z0rnEUX3KzaUFYfZmc596TRAVo7wnOYpG+Bw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:47cb:: with SMTP id o11mr22053351wrc.138.1643729997528; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 07:39:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm2951531wmq.23.2022.02.01.07.39.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Feb 2022 07:39:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:39:55 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/64] 5.4.176-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220131105215.644174521@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220131105215.644174521@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:55:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.176 release. > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Feb 2022 10:51:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/686 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip