From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFD5EC433F5 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4D63C989C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:24:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFDA3C9574 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:24:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9AE1A007E3 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:24:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6FA1F397; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1643736285; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RT511HirDYhDwv23wig4GjgXsc0OunFvmrSj524fOcY=; b=qSYnEqyN/T25MPl4JcV8jM+vrxoQ2V7DJD4rpoNOOeJcblwB1LA61MIEJ/l1+1CMAoPocy J4stC1FcbQ4SzQbqdHL/JPjA3ogoRomlJKHmRR0oinRSrk58Neymjzzqw1v/mpXyBY3PR5 OtAcBYbKVGBzO5tzc1kzQe3XoiGH81w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1643736285; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RT511HirDYhDwv23wig4GjgXsc0OunFvmrSj524fOcY=; b=I2w8q33oq0lSjHy9wYB83Ip/I+SQQkyWbE8J6rNUY77ij4mRaHNk9yZinj4sch9dnDU4D5 p+Wll5UfxJD4JSBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A46013B64; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id XsgaE91s+WEYbQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:24:45 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:24:43 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Richard Palethorpe Message-ID: References: <20220126164703.7177-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <877daey2wp.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877daey2wp.fsf@suse.de> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] Fix tst_mkfs_ doc X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Richie, > Hello, > Petr Vorel writes: > > Hi Cyril, > >> > * @fs_opts: NULL or NULL terminated array of mkfs options > >> > - * @extra_opt: extra mkfs option which is passed after the device name > >> > + * @extra_opts: NULL or NULL terminated array of extra mkfs options which is > >> ^ > >> are > > I wasn't sure about the grammar, I thought the NULL *is* passed or > > the NULL terminated array *is* passed. But not really sure. > > Kind regards, > > Petr > *are* sounds more natural to me. Probably due to the order of specifying > the array (singular) then its contents (plural). If you wrote something > like "The extra mkfs options NULL terminated array is ...", then it > would be more natural to use *is*. Thanks for the explanation, merged with are. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp