All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] copy_process(): Move fd_install() out of sighand->siglock critical section
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:16:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgKziblMKsmHkP4f@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208163912.1084752-1-longman@redhat.com>

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:39:12AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:

> One way to solve this problem is to move the fd_install() call out of
> the sighand->siglock critical section.
> 
> Before commit 6fd2fe494b17 ("copy_process(): don't use ksys_close()
> on cleanups"), the pidfd installation was done without holding both
> the task_list lock and the sighand->siglock. Obviously, holding these
> two locks are not really needed to protect the fd_install() call.
> So move the fd_install() call down to after the releases of both locks.

	Umm... That assumes we can delay it that far.  IOW, that nothing
relies upon having pidfd observable in /proc/*/fd as soon as the child
becomes visible there in the first place.

	What warranties are expected from CLONE_PIDFD wrt observation of
child's descriptor table?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 16:39 [PATCH] copy_process(): Move fd_install() out of sighand->siglock critical section Waiman Long
2022-02-08 18:16 ` Al Viro [this message]
2022-02-08 18:51   ` Waiman Long
2022-02-08 19:07     ` Al Viro
2022-02-08 21:59       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-08 22:16         ` Al Viro
2022-02-08 22:25           ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-09 16:25         ` Waiman Long
2022-02-11  8:27       ` Christian Brauner
2022-02-09 22:18 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgKziblMKsmHkP4f@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=legion@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.