From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BE7C433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52D13C9F28 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:13:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B2C3C945D for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:13:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 048241A0093A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:13:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E822113A; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:13:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1644585229; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Bf3KX1A5GP7x8ayEh1KOjC7Q9l9E76l69v/i4ca+WL4=; b=bYJTBhWodEDkJFux9S3a8rfc/MZKwyNy8/5wOuYqT7xPOAJeRwz2ay8M6MU2M1IxMtX9pd /WTVUbKsQy/gvUCAMjJ8y/QpuKRIDP0B7Fvwhlv4ifvtZxJef1ALU52htl0OLYr9LKfxm9 4VU2tFA4Tqq0KBSc0YMU7h+mNFR2aAo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1644585229; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Bf3KX1A5GP7x8ayEh1KOjC7Q9l9E76l69v/i4ca+WL4=; b=kjWG+jhQbKWoD3FIXBux1suHrqKUyZPsvFdPIIh9yUAWbddZAEmaMmExHZ2wGV/hwDbpAa NCj1u1W9S5Q+vQCQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D492913C83; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id Yn/aLgxhBmKxBwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:13:48 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:15:56 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20220210133812.13368-1-bogdan.lezhepekov@suse.com> <6205BA38.7070903@fujitsu.com> <62061EC1.2040206@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] mem/swapping01: Make sure swap is supported by kernel X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > 1) keep check access("/proc/swaps", F_OK) > 2) use .needs_config for "CONFIG_SWAP=y" > 3) Add .needs_swap flag to struct tst_test > > To be honest, I'm not sure, what's the best, probably .needs_config. > I worried little bit about .needs_config forcing config to be available in the > past, but that should be solved KCONFIG_SKIP_CHECK added by Xu. I guess that the easiest solution would be .needs_kconfig, we ended up depending on it in quite a few testcases anyway so I would say that nobody is runing LTP without having kernel config exproted anyways. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp