From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCA0C433FE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229603AbiCALg5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2022 06:36:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57524 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234580AbiCALg4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2022 06:36:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1426A92D3B; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 03:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id i8so2947920wrr.8; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 03:36:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cY7j81vVJCKOqzb7oZyUm2nyS7klLCQTNKpSA1EA5BE=; b=XX4DlY7cD/W9DEoDYErHAJN6xdWkPER190sHEXVYuIKKNCJSHGDCaGSPRuT397F65S XBZlipj8/1FXMFi6UQVUS06hKGrUUW8+66hJ6LhWOgc4oADCpKZlMaSS8V5a5hGobjxs da3wp5FKdzc/XI02WXVLMAWfDPqm+N7OuthKMpQL6mO1gE9TUtbivnvZCJ2BmswF4vwz h9+aNwFEiKSmncs/Aet8WL9eZ3nOi6H5tj0GKGK8/j8700sMjdMgbrTB71IHDctgzdal rBRBAvSNU8e4/8Bjpj68GaEENQVHnRt9IgfEJCuNz5DI8zWNlxbnbD2MvLeLShx+cgnY 2wLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cY7j81vVJCKOqzb7oZyUm2nyS7klLCQTNKpSA1EA5BE=; b=4mLH2XZR68SXRJGwHEIRCSVXJOldRezxzgCBUAqqhfDdpuvPIpbCGbuIO38coKcW+p CxJ8w9SpUnvWs4CBm7oDGeT4+hwml0Sy35emOMCxLH6ag1fgiFmlJhXLy/zZe25zoqh1 5VWBGU+8s9KxMGry6yjqHpOhVihuXGwxbIRiULeWJmgNY78K6RlKSv84PZ/xEkcCnIV+ A0QwQyapvDMTwowokBODBzrkaRhNgDfeXPk4FWHwRTRhBaVL7kRW0+LfK4g/f60QarHg 3ICzQ79HH0DN/RiDeq9mEAdHm7Gee+eYiVOOpWR8JdiGFHuZu6OYJln8fQdtVroD7WAy DBkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530q/0cP6j+f7G9zgEr5MlRQgzMLQISXUepRb7PmggPwj3vojvsb bIvXT8edH309rHD/tz7MfjFmSMOgFAxxeQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7tyWSWkX0s0A+31hlwGVmMypbjcxRw95hLMmJZy+aH2CWcsi//xfOdxOvC/TLxjFHRR9iQA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:18ab:b0:1f0:1581:fdcf with SMTP id b11-20020a05600018ab00b001f01581fdcfmr1827618wri.490.1646134573651; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 03:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11-20020adf9d4b000000b001f0077ea337sm2108949wre.22.2022.03.01.03.36.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 03:36:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:36:11 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/80] 5.10.103-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220228172311.789892158@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220228172311.789892158@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 06:23:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.103 release. > There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:20:16 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/823 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/824 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip