On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 07:26:30AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > The patch seems pretty wrong. What's problematic is system workqueue flushes
> > (which flushes the entire workqueue), not work item flushes.
> 
> Why? My understanding is that
> 
>   flushing a workqueue waits for completion of all work items in that workqueue
> 
>   flushing a work item waits for for completion of that work item using
>   a workqueue specified as of queue_work()
> 
> and
> 
>   if a work item in some workqueue is blocked by other work in that workqueue
>   (e.g. max_active limit, work items on that workqueue and locks they need),
>   it has a risk of deadlock
> 
> . Then, how can flushing a work item using system-wide workqueues be free of deadlock risk?
> Isn't it just "unlikely to deadlock" rather than "impossible to deadlock"?

If we're jamming system_wq with a combination of work items which need more
than max_active to make forward progress, we're stuck regardless of flushes.
What's needed at that point is increasing max_active (or something along
that line).

Thanks.

-- 
tejun