From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA1DC433F5 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230343AbiCCN05 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:26:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38040 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230286AbiCCN05 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:26:57 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11884188859 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 05:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5081218D6; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1646313969; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KU1ESgWGVcxhNgj7MsT+FVwOhStany1C1ykZ09FN0Mg=; b=HZWgYtq7HnA7M5U+f+aBCXYiJR4TTDaZxLJHb+IOyuyVR+E4Ccdoj8hpA3CGLWX8QT5LN8 ZYxNdHM1E1VebGIiwoajXxasinCCEjzjUADx9sdJHNKx1EA3mIYCNSzqP0DfWVnLQPXuG4 PQfuqXBhdxreSLipWkx9yF0efZWSslE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1646313969; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KU1ESgWGVcxhNgj7MsT+FVwOhStany1C1ykZ09FN0Mg=; b=JPSgQmYl30tREmq6lr/WT2sLUMriKIG5iMewt3TfeFPWCONEiv0FkD7r9YR/WCEQve0CfG mbCtDp1blW8aMoBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910EC13C23; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id yKTJIfHBIGKAWgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 13:26:09 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:26:07 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: Yael Tzur , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys with provided decrypted data. Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20220223200731.1859670-1-yaelt@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Hi Cyril, > Hi! > > > I this case I guess that in this case the change is so minimal that we > > > can add this test into LTP once it reaches Linus tree. > > Cyril, maybe we could finally merge our policy (waiting ack for you): > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20220203101803.10204-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com/ > > and put keyctl09 into runtest/staging now. > I guess that we still did not agree on exactly how this should be > handled or did we? Isn't it enough "Once a feature is part of the stable kernel ABI the associated test must be moved out of staging." ? If not, we should raise this question on that patch thread to find a conclusion. Kind regards, Petr From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12AD8C4332F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B52C3CA368 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:26:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2AF3C9544 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:26:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1AF1000954 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:26:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5081218D6; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1646313969; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KU1ESgWGVcxhNgj7MsT+FVwOhStany1C1ykZ09FN0Mg=; b=HZWgYtq7HnA7M5U+f+aBCXYiJR4TTDaZxLJHb+IOyuyVR+E4Ccdoj8hpA3CGLWX8QT5LN8 ZYxNdHM1E1VebGIiwoajXxasinCCEjzjUADx9sdJHNKx1EA3mIYCNSzqP0DfWVnLQPXuG4 PQfuqXBhdxreSLipWkx9yF0efZWSslE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1646313969; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KU1ESgWGVcxhNgj7MsT+FVwOhStany1C1ykZ09FN0Mg=; b=JPSgQmYl30tREmq6lr/WT2sLUMriKIG5iMewt3TfeFPWCONEiv0FkD7r9YR/WCEQve0CfG mbCtDp1blW8aMoBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910EC13C23; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id yKTJIfHBIGKAWgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 13:26:09 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:26:07 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: <20220223200731.1859670-1-yaelt@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys with provided decrypted data. X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Yael Tzur , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Cyril, > Hi! > > > I this case I guess that in this case the change is so minimal that we > > > can add this test into LTP once it reaches Linus tree. > > Cyril, maybe we could finally merge our policy (waiting ack for you): > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20220203101803.10204-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com/ > > and put keyctl09 into runtest/staging now. > I guess that we still did not agree on exactly how this should be > handled or did we? Isn't it enough "Once a feature is part of the stable kernel ABI the associated test must be moved out of staging." ? If not, we should raise this question on that patch thread to find a conclusion. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp