All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 18:38:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YieirBSr1FfELXXH@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiecYxd/YreGFWpB@google.com>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Inline kvm_calc_mmu_role_common into its sole caller, and simplify it
> > by removing the computation of unnecessary bits.
> > 
> > Extended bits are unnecessary because page walking uses the CPU mode,
> > and EFER.NX/CR0.WP can be set to one unconditionally---matching the
> > format of shadow pages rather than the format of guest pages.
> 
> But they don't match the format of shadow pages.  EPT has an equivalent to NX in
> that KVM can always clear X, but KVM explicitly supports running with EPT and
> EFER.NX=0 in the host (32-bit non-PAE kernels).

Oof, digging into this made me realize we probably have yet another bug in the
handling of the NX hugepages workaround.  Unless I'm overlooking something, NX is
treated as reserved for NPT shadow pages and would cause WARN spam if someone
enabled the mitigation on AMD CPUs.

Untested...  If this is needed, it also means I didn't properly test commit
b26a71a1a5b9 ("KVM: SVM: Refuse to load kvm_amd if NX support is not available").

:-(

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:31:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't treat NX as reserved for NPT MMUs

Mark the NX bit as allowed for NPT shadow pages.  KVM doesn't use NX in
"normal" operation as KVM doesn't honor userspace execute-protection
settings, but KVM allows userspace to enable the NX hugepages mitigation
on AMD CPUs, despite no known AMD CPUs being affected by the iTLB
multi-hit erratum.

Fixes: b8e8c8303ff2 ("kvm: mmu: ITLB_MULTIHIT mitigation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 47a2c5f3044d..9c79a0927a48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4461,13 +4461,17 @@ static inline bool boot_cpu_is_amd(void)
 	return shadow_x_mask == 0;
 }

-/*
- * the direct page table on host, use as much mmu features as
- * possible, however, kvm currently does not do execution-protection.
- */
 static void
 reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_mmu *context)
 {
+	/*
+	 * KVM doesn't honor execute-protection from the host page tables, but
+	 * NX is required and potentially used at any time by KVM for NPT, as
+	 * the NX hugepages iTLB multi-hit mitigation is supported for any CPU
+	 * despite no known AMD (and derivative) CPUs being affected by erratum.
+	 */
+	bool efer_nx = true;
+
 	struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
 	int i;

@@ -4475,7 +4479,7 @@ reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_mmu *context)

 	if (boot_cpu_is_amd())
 		__reset_rsvds_bits_mask(shadow_zero_check, reserved_hpa_bits(),
-					context->shadow_root_level, false,
+					context->shadow_root_level, efer_nx,
 					boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES),
 					false, true);
 	else

base-commit: 2a809a65d88e7e071dc6ef4a6be8416d25885efe
--


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-08 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 16:22 [PATCH v2 00/25] KVM MMU refactoring part 2: role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:16   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 16:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:32       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 16:43         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:53           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:14             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] KVM: x86/mmu: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] KVM: x86/mmu: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] KVM: x86/mmu: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rephrase unclear comment Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 16:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: do not monkey-patch inject_page_fault callback Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 20:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove "bool base_only" arguments Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] KVM: x86/mmu: split cpu_mode from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:36   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:55   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09  9:58     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-09 15:38       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 15:40         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] KVM: x86/mmu: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove ept_ad field Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 17:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:17       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:18         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 18:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 18:38     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] KVM: x86/mmu: store shadow EFER.NX in the MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove extended bits from mmu_role, rename field Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] KVM: x86/mmu: rename kvm_mmu_role union Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove redundant bits from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] KVM: x86/mmu: remove valid " Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] KVM: x86/mmu: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 19:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 10:33     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] KVM: x86/mmu: pull CPU mode computation to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace shadow_root_level with root_role.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace root_level with cpu_mode.base.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:49   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] KVM: x86/mmu: replace direct_map with root_role.direct Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 19:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] KVM: x86/mmu: initialize constant-value fields just once Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 20:58   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 10:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] KVM: x86/mmu: extract initialization of the page walking data Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 20:02   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YieirBSr1FfELXXH@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.