All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: QEMU device refcounting when device creates a container MR
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:19:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yin67GyJWDn5N1ov@xz-m1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7f6ffef-8ce1-6ee1-9ad7-a90ed1b54122@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:40:15AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Cc'ing David / Peter
> 
> On 9/3/22 11:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Hi; does anybody know how device reference counting is supposed
> > to work when the device creates a "container" MemoryRegion which
> > it then puts some of its own subregions in to?
> > 
> > As far as I can see when you do memory_region_add_subregion it
> > increases the refcount on the owner of the subregion. So if a
> > device creates a container MR in its own init or realize method
> > and adds sub-MRs that it owns to that container, this increases
> > the refcount on the device permanently, and so the device won't
> > ever be deinited.
> > 
> > As a specific example, the usb-chipidea device does this in its
> > init method, so if you run the arm device-introspect-test under
> > leak-sanitizer it complains about a memory leak that happens
> > when the device is put through the "init-introspect-deref" cycle.

I'm not extremely sure about this, but.. does it mean that the device may
better put any of the add-subregion operations into realize() rather than
instance_init()?  Then in the unrealize() of the devices we should do
proper del-subregion to release these refcounts.

Otherwise indeed I don't see a good way to destroy the device anymore,
because the assumption is after device initialized, only with that will the
object_unref() continue to work on the device..

That means, perhaps in object_init_with_type() we should make sure the
object refcount==1 after the ->instance_init() call?

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-09 10:33 QEMU device refcounting when device creates a container MR Peter Maydell
2022-03-09 10:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-03-10 13:19   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-03-10 13:45     ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-11  2:19       ` Peter Xu
2022-03-09 16:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-09 16:53   ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-09 16:56     ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-10 15:36       ` Igor Mammedov
2022-03-10 16:05         ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-10 16:30           ` Igor Mammedov
2022-03-10 17:11             ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-18 17:13               ` Igor Mammedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yin67GyJWDn5N1ov@xz-m1.local \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.