All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/: Refactor hsw_crtc_enable for bigjoiner cleanup
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 20:52:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjODhPSLKXsOfWGv@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315233856.30255-1-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:38:56PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> This patch abstracts pieces of hsw_crtc_enable corresponding to different
> Bspec enable sequence steps into separate functions.
> This helps to call them in a specific order for bigjoiner master/slave
> in a cleaner fashion.
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 125 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index eb49973621f0..d8e6466c9fa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1865,24 +1865,6 @@ static void hsw_set_frame_start_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	intel_de_write(dev_priv, reg, val);
>  }
>  
> -static void icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -					 const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> -	struct intel_crtc *master_crtc = intel_master_crtc(crtc_state);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Enable sequence steps 1-7 on bigjoiner master
> -	 */
> -	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> -		intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, master_crtc);
> -
> -	if (crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> -		intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
> -
> -	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> -		intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, master_crtc);
> -}
> -
>  static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -1910,70 +1892,73 @@ static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta
>  	hsw_set_transconf(crtc_state);
>  }
>  
> -static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -			    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static void hsw_crtc_pre_pll_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				    const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> -	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> -	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> -	bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> -
> -	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> -		return;
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  
> -	if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
> -		intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> +	/*
> +	 * Enable sequence steps 1 - 7 on all pipes
> +	 */
> +	intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> +	if (crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> +		intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
>  
> -		if (new_crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> -			intel_enable_shared_dpll(new_crtc_state);
> +	intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> +}
>  
> -		intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> -	} else {
> -		icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> -	}
> +static void hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				     const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> +	bool psl_clkgate_wa;
>  
> -	intel_dsc_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +	/*
> +	 * Enable sequence step 8
> +	 */
> +	intel_dsc_enable(crtc_state);
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13)
> -		intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +		intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(crtc_state);
>  
> -	intel_set_pipe_src_size(new_crtc_state);
> +	intel_set_pipe_src_size(crtc_state);
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> -		bdw_set_pipemisc(new_crtc_state);
> +		bdw_set_pipemisc(crtc_state);
>  
> -	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state) &&
> +	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state) &&
>  	    !transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder))
> -		hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(new_crtc_state);
> +		hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(crtc_state);
>  
>  	crtc->active = true;
>  
>  	/* Display WA #1180: WaDisableScalarClockGating: glk */
>  	psl_clkgate_wa = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10 &&
> -		new_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> +		crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
>  	if (psl_clkgate_wa)
>  		glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, true);
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> -		skl_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +		skl_pfit_enable(crtc_state);
>  	else
> -		ilk_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +		ilk_pfit_enable(crtc_state);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * On ILK+ LUT must be loaded before the pipe is running but with
>  	 * clocks enabled
>  	 */
> -	intel_color_load_luts(new_crtc_state);
> -	intel_color_commit(new_crtc_state);
> +	intel_color_load_luts(crtc_state);
> +	intel_color_commit(crtc_state);
>  	/* update DSPCNTR to configure gamma/csc for pipe bottom color */
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> -		intel_disable_primary_plane(new_crtc_state);
> +		intel_disable_primary_plane(crtc_state);
>  
> -	hsw_set_linetime_wm(new_crtc_state);
> +	hsw_set_linetime_wm(crtc_state);
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> -		icl_set_pipe_chicken(new_crtc_state);
> +		icl_set_pipe_chicken(crtc_state);
>  
>  	intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
>  
> @@ -1984,8 +1969,8 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		icl_pipe_mbus_enable(crtc, dbuf_state->joined_mbus);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state))
> -		intel_crtc_vblank_on(new_crtc_state);
> +	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> +		intel_crtc_vblank_on(crtc_state);
>  
>  	intel_encoders_enable(state, crtc);
>  
> @@ -1996,7 +1981,7 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	/* If we change the relative order between pipe/planes enabling, we need
>  	 * to change the workaround. */
> -	hsw_workaround_pipe = new_crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> +	hsw_workaround_pipe = crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
>  	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && hsw_workaround_pipe != INVALID_PIPE) {
>  		struct intel_crtc *wa_crtc;
>  
> @@ -2007,6 +1992,29 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +			    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> +	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> +		return;
> +
> +	hsw_crtc_pre_pll_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, slave_crtc,
> +					 intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(new_crtc_state)) {
> +		struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> +			intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, slave_crtc);
> +
> +		hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(state, slave_crtc_state);
> +	}
> +	hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> +}

I suspect this is far too high level for bigjoiner. Eg. there's a bunch
of things already in the disable sequence that seem to need much more
low level sequencing between the joined pipes. So my gut feeling still
is that we want to continue the per-pipe vs. per-transcoder split and
do the joiner loops in lower level code.

> +
>  void ilk_pfit_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(old_crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -8122,11 +8130,11 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	intel_crtc_update_active_timings(new_crtc_state);
>  
> -	dev_priv->display->crtc_enable(state, crtc);
> -
>  	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state))
>  		return;
>  
> +	dev_priv->display->crtc_enable(state, crtc);
> +
>  	intel_drrs_enable(new_crtc_state);
>  
>  	/* vblanks work again, re-enable pipe CRC. */
> @@ -8360,8 +8368,7 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (intel_dp_mst_is_slave_trans(new_crtc_state) ||
> -		    is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state) ||
> -		    intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(new_crtc_state))
> +		    is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		modeset_pipes &= ~BIT(pipe);
> @@ -8371,7 +8378,7 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Then we enable all remaining pipes that depend on other
> -	 * pipes: MST slaves and port sync masters, big joiner master
> +	 * pipes: MST slaves and port sync masters
>  	 */
>  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
>  		enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> -- 
> 2.19.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-15 23:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/: Refactor hsw_crtc_enable for bigjoiner cleanup Manasi Navare
2022-03-16  0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-03-16  3:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-16  7:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-16 17:10   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 15:35     ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 18:28       ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 18:31         ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 19:15           ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 18:52 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-03-17 19:05   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-17 19:14     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-30  0:00       ` Navare, Manasi
2022-03-30  9:53         ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YjODhPSLKXsOfWGv@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.