On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:23:45PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:

> > > +      - microchip,lan966x-qspi

> > Generally DT compatibles should be for specific SoCs rather than having
> > wildcards in them, even if that means you have to list a lot of SoCs.
> > Having used wildcards in the past doesn't mean it's a good idea to
> > continue adding them!

> The subject should also be prefixed with "dt-bindings: ".

I tend to complain about people doing that.

> Mark, I did a git log on
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,quadspi.yaml and all the
> subjects are without "dt-bindings:" although the original patch was with
> that prefix [1]. Is that intended?

Yes.