From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155C1C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234445AbiDMJcF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:32:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231222AbiDMJb4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:31:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5178330543 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 02:29:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1649842173; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ss4icJRzT/CRgX0lA3mqnDiaVS28swR/SsJFvAdocPs=; b=FsEp52HG2Pn+Wnra06glss+E/aJhzY8B0XIIl3mZPNGv8Bv6ZB0JeGD8FlyTaRU44dOgBT 4I6JegHw1L4cm6D0W0BNF2uAH/nQ5gVvmk1NAXyBsD7tfxK+QZ3/j260E6DI8kpF9F1XCe s92G9QLwUIkbBcVWpfvjLLoaxVO3L5E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-332-OHjYqE3rOxCCBirmZYSY5Q-1; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:29:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OHjYqE3rOxCCBirmZYSY5Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BA1899EC1; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-51.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.51]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11343C27E8E; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:29:24 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Heiko Carstens , hch@lst.de Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, amit.kachhap@arm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/3] Convert vmcore to use an iov_iter Message-ID: References: <20220408090636.560886-1-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/11/22 at 10:59am, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:24:28PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > Add Heiko to CC. > > > > On 04/08/22 at 05:06pm, Baoquan He wrote: > > > Copy the description of v3 cover letter from Willy: > > > === > > > For some reason several people have been sending bad patches to fix > > > compiler warnings in vmcore recently. Here's how it should be done. > > > Compile-tested only on x86. As noted in the first patch, s390 should > > > take this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined to do that > > > work myself. > > > > Forgot adding Heiko to CC again. > > > > Hi Heiko, > > > > Andrew worried you may miss the note, "As noted in the first patch, > > s390 should take this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined > > to do that work myself." written in cover letter from willy. > > > > I told him you had already known this in v1 discussion. So add you in CC > > list as Andrew required. Adding words to explain, just in case confusion. > > Thanks for letting me know again. I'm still aware of this, but would > appreciate if I could be added to cc in the first patch of this > series, so I get notified when Andrew sends this Linus. Right, it's my neglect. I should CC all involved during the discussion. By the way, could both of you, Heiko, Christoph, help check this patchset and offer your ack again if it's OK to you? I removed Christoph's Reviewed-by because there's some change as per Al's comment, and replace my own 'Acked-by' with 'Signed-off-by' according to our posting rule. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baoquan He Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:29:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/3] Convert vmcore to use an iov_iter In-Reply-To: References: <20220408090636.560886-1-bhe@redhat.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kexec@lists.infradead.org On 04/11/22 at 10:59am, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:24:28PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > Add Heiko to CC. > > > > On 04/08/22 at 05:06pm, Baoquan He wrote: > > > Copy the description of v3 cover letter from Willy: > > > === > > > For some reason several people have been sending bad patches to fix > > > compiler warnings in vmcore recently. Here's how it should be done. > > > Compile-tested only on x86. As noted in the first patch, s390 should > > > take this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined to do that > > > work myself. > > > > Forgot adding Heiko to CC again. > > > > Hi Heiko, > > > > Andrew worried you may miss the note, "As noted in the first patch, > > s390 should take this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined > > to do that work myself." written in cover letter from willy. > > > > I told him you had already known this in v1 discussion. So add you in CC > > list as Andrew required. Adding words to explain, just in case confusion. > > Thanks for letting me know again. I'm still aware of this, but would > appreciate if I could be added to cc in the first patch of this > series, so I get notified when Andrew sends this Linus. Right, it's my neglect. I should CC all involved during the discussion. By the way, could both of you, Heiko, Christoph, help check this patchset and offer your ack again if it's OK to you? I removed Christoph's Reviewed-by because there's some change as per Al's comment, and replace my own 'Acked-by' with 'Signed-off-by' according to our posting rule.