From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CA8C433EF for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1449002AbiDVO4K (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:56:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1448951AbiDVOz7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:55:59 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBBBA5C36E; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 811FEB8307B; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92041C385A4; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1650639183; bh=T9UBwXuqufvpPkwkvMfLrSuvMpCvswDkzG2OAhXGXms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gtR6ueBjj90k6uXG+sGb62mjEPhUyWqCc4g/LYsDAGDC86QvoXlQYy95NhT2btdF8 P0xl3sQ3qmwmyqmSN38lcytsJbQgKvLmqdrL0dhCwz49yEBz1tKjoPpydxABJtmKdz GxSusnTu+4goI0K1PWwTnb2+/G0VhcVxFy2lzYdc= Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:53:00 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "T.J. Mercier" Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch, tj@kernel.org, Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Jonathan Corbet , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Hridya Valsaraju , Suren Baghdasaryan , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Benjamin Gaignard , Liam Mark , Laura Abbott , Brian Starkey , John Stultz , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Shuah Khan , jstultz@google.com, cmllamas@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, Kenny.Ho@amd.com, mkoutny@suse.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@android.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller Message-ID: References: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > include resource limit enforcements. > > Changelog: > v5: > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you think this is real. confused, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C377C433EF for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E59410E1B5; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C7B10E252 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C6460FF8; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92041C385A4; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:53:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1650639183; bh=T9UBwXuqufvpPkwkvMfLrSuvMpCvswDkzG2OAhXGXms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gtR6ueBjj90k6uXG+sGb62mjEPhUyWqCc4g/LYsDAGDC86QvoXlQYy95NhT2btdF8 P0xl3sQ3qmwmyqmSN38lcytsJbQgKvLmqdrL0dhCwz49yEBz1tKjoPpydxABJtmKdz GxSusnTu+4goI0K1PWwTnb2+/G0VhcVxFy2lzYdc= Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:53:00 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "T.J. Mercier" Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller Message-ID: References: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , cmllamas@google.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, jstultz@google.com, Zefan Li , kaleshsingh@google.com, Joel Fernandes , Shuah Khan , Sumit Semwal , Benjamin Gaignard , Jonathan Corbet , Martijn Coenen , Laura Abbott , kernel-team@android.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Todd Kjos , Thomas Zimmermann , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Hridya Valsaraju , skhan@linuxfoundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Suren Baghdasaryan , Christian Brauner , Kenny.Ho@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Mark , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , mkoutny@suse.com, Johannes Weiner , tj@kernel.org, Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > include resource limit enforcements. > > Changelog: > v5: > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you think this is real. confused, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:53:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1650639183; bh=T9UBwXuqufvpPkwkvMfLrSuvMpCvswDkzG2OAhXGXms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gtR6ueBjj90k6uXG+sGb62mjEPhUyWqCc4g/LYsDAGDC86QvoXlQYy95NhT2btdF8 P0xl3sQ3qmwmyqmSN38lcytsJbQgKvLmqdrL0dhCwz49yEBz1tKjoPpydxABJtmKdz GxSusnTu+4goI0K1PWwTnb2+/G0VhcVxFy2lzYdc= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "T.J. Mercier" Cc: daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org, tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Jonathan Corbet , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Hridya Valsaraju , Suren Baghdasaryan , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Benjamin Gaignard , Liam Mark , Laura Abbott , Brian Starkey On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > include resource limit enforcements. > > Changelog: > v5: > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you think this is real. confused, greg k-h