All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 09:44:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnAKabMjPr6oFAGR@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dba9162-c64d-2d27-12eb-d48ac6a4ac8a@gmx.com>

On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 12:53:00PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > It looks like this patch is causing test failure in btrfs/027, at least
> > for subapge (64K page size, 4K sectorsize) cases.
> 
> Also confirmed the same hang on the same commit on x86_64 (4K page size
> 4K sectorsize).
> 
> Also 100% reproducible.

I'll take a look.  It turns out I never actually run that test as it
doesn't run without at least 5 devices in the scratch pool, and my btrfs
config uses 4.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 14:30 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_submit_dio_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] btrfs: split btrfs_submit_data_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: don't double-defer bio completions for compressed reads Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-01  4:40   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-01  4:53     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-02 16:44       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-06-03 16:44       ` David Sterba
2022-06-03 16:45         ` David Sterba
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] btrfs: don't use btrfs_bio_wq_end_io for compressed writes Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] btrfs: centralize setting REQ_META Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] btrfs: remove btrfs_end_io_wq Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: refactor btrfs_map_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 14:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] btrfs: do not allocate a btrfs_bio for low-level bios Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-04 12:25 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-04 12:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25  7:54 cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25  7:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] btrfs: defer I/O completion based on the btrfs_raid_bio Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnAKabMjPr6oFAGR@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.