From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8CC433FE for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 06:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350337AbiELG1g (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 02:27:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55786 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350334AbiELG12 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 02:27:28 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDDC5EBE4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 23:27:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1652336827; x=1683872827; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=d+kclMhgHvlLhi3EthWInqpndqvLALipWSfXYj/Q96c=; b=STGQu9VTYCdI9E+bdSgjGlS7Pa5OzaNBZL1J82VwOFJ271Dhpd95xYMw cNbEWj6pDqs/Yn0obZnqshJl6gKkUxQ9AZcoNigDvkbxYfVgvoU9JnAEG fZl4fIG1jS2dJCrVDfFTP2ymRFq8v7XvjxjYSexAbgWU1hOeXp5uktRrI mbeVJzFUQiePGVjFK77KC6eNlO2FlB5dsMDEKuu+lG6xK/4nHmw0/uJ5t 3FDP7ynUp6HIWFpRGOazKnYT0JZvFkM+2btfL5BHtj4rwpTwDMVJO9oBB P+y5IPfes9RyrIp6QmR0/8Yron/mKwoQQCPYaJD15C3DDFd4yQHVY+/y5 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10344"; a="249801891" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,218,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="249801891" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2022 23:27:06 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,218,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="739547610" Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.162]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2022 23:27:03 -0700 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 12 May 2022 09:27:00 +0300 Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:27:00 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Gil Fine Cc: andreas.noever@gmail.com, michael.jamet@intel.com, YehezkelShB@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] thunderbolt: Fix buffers allocation for device without DisplayPort adaptors Message-ID: References: <20220509204904.8936-1-gil.fine@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220509204904.8936-1-gil.fine@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Hi Gil, On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:49:02PM +0300, Gil Fine wrote: > For the case of device without DP adaptors, we calculate incorrectly the > buffers allocation. Here we fix the calculation for this case. > In addition, we add a KUnit test for this case. > > Gil Fine (2): > thunderbolt: Fix buffers allocation for device without DisplayPort > adaptors > thunderbolt: Add KUnit test for buffer allocation for device without > DisplayPort adaptors Both applied to thunderbolt.git/next, thanks!